Raw LLM Responses

People seem to forget in the end it's still a computer program that someone CONTROLS... Is it a good idea to have one company and a small group of people controlling such a powerful WEAPON... THEY can edit an restrict the AI from talking about certain topics and they can program the .. AI to push certain political narratives for them. WE DIDN'T learn anything from large sclae central banking and the federal reserve banking? Small groups of people controlling everything and 1% of the people own 95% of the money in circulation... While everyone else is struggling to survive. Why would giving that same 1% control of a weapon of mass manipulation, narrative spinning, information editing, information control, political narrative control... We should just give control of that to the small 1%?? Just like we did banking...?? Horrible idea, that brings nothing good for regular people. The people in control will make it so the A. I. Is restricted from talking about or giving advice to us regular people that could possibly disrupt the status quo and banking system. It'll keep the poor people poor and be working to make the rich fat richer... And keeping it that way. All while finding ways to manipulate people into following narratives that the A. I. Owners want people to follow... Like who to vote for, what laws to pass &, approve, how to create more obedient lower class people... There are NO PROS for us middle and lower class AT ALL. THE RICH WILL GET RICHER AND MUCH MORE CONTROL. WILL NEVER HEAR ANOTHER STORY ABOUT ANYTHING LIKE EPSTEIN.. BC ALL THE HIGH UP PEOPLE INVOLVED.. the a. I won't talk about an will manipulate people Into looking in the wrong direction. People still control the AI and what it can do..