Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Why are we still discussing this? Only consciousness is conscious. AI is a simul…
ytc_UgyaLk2gz…
G
Another AI fearmongering video... Dude, i also look scary AF when you remove my …
ytc_Ugx91HDPW…
G
We are screwed by 2030, write it down, mark my words! if there is no serious com…
ytc_UgwC5MGfd…
G
When I saw the blackberry, I knew what it was for, how to use it. AI.. Not so mu…
ytc_Ugz-bKd5B…
G
If we do not consomme how the system finance itself and survive?
I thought Marx …
ytc_UgykmWsgM…
G
We need to outlaw self driving vehicles on public roads until they perfect the t…
ytc_Ugznin-ac…
G
on the ai learning, being smarter question: joel salitan, farmer, was in an inte…
ytc_UgxWFmGfL…
G
they are just trying to suck up Ai artist's fame and think it will make them fam…
ytc_UgwZApmV5…
Comment
Consider this: if most companies utilize AI, it could potentially eliminate around 60% of the workforce. That 60% will not be able to find a job, so what happens to the companies profits when there are 60% fewer customers now available! Not to mention the social problems this could create. Make the math work for me, I don't see it. If you receive a dividend, as he says, then you become a subclass, as you will receive a minuscule part, since it has to be shared among 60% of the people who are currently unemployed; then again, you arrive at the same conclusion with the same problems. I believe this could transform the world into a "socialist" global society, where the ruling part is the company that manages the language models, and the rest receive a basic income; however, it will require something of you to obtain that basic income. Make this make sense? I could be 100% wrong, but it certainly appears that way, and I work in the tech ecosystem.
youtube
AI Moral Status
2025-07-25T19:3…
♥ 2
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | fear |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxbzFzUcLviNTFmK3V4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx2vLP3y4OOoOaNPah4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"skepticism"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxhoR5UHK6THIMTaSF4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzZhKhJ4iVVt2hAfQN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxgQLOVOtt98fyt7lR4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwWxPJKhJVI0MzAic94AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzDbssCuyZV4i4D89N4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzD6hIZA8zXmdwa9gN4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxWmftk2HugRn7na3t4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxGm-uZtJ_u4Pe3TGp4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}
]