Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
AI "artists" telling artists to just quit drawing is like a miner berating the b…
ytc_UgxQFcn_x…
G
We have no chance of stopping this.
The sociopathic tech oligarchs developing AI…
ytc_Ugy6-ZEeP…
G
I'm BLOODY scared of AI NOW!!! I had no idea...that they would want to HURT US …
ytc_UgwL9gs33…
G
I've worked with AI quite a bit to develop some code. Yes, it can HELP you. No…
ytc_UgxuxBpcl…
G
Alex has gone too far holding ChatGPT to having lied for saying it was excited a…
ytc_Ugy3HJnSY…
G
The blind surfer uses descriptive AI to describe what is in his pantry. It can t…
ytc_UgxwDX2Aa…
G
My conspiracy theory is that robot racism is a big tech psyop intended to genera…
ytc_UgwhztwL0…
G
Free, Locally Run, Open Source and Uncensored.
That's the future of AI.
And si…
ytc_UgykjzIue…
Comment
The reason music AI being handled differently is quite simple (I am a musician/songwriter). There are only 12 notes in western music! This means that there is a finite number of melodies that can be created. Many of them have already been copyrighted and new songs are created every day. The odds of any songwriter (including AI) coming up with a new "original" melody is quite slim at this point considering the limitations of 12 notes. It is not just those 12 notes, but having them sound "good" usually requires some structure. These structures are usually referred to in music as "keys" or "modes", reducing the 12 notes down to 7 (8 with the octave) that work together well. This reduces the melody note choices even further. I believe this is why the music AI advancement is much slower.
Music AI will get there in the coming years. Songwriters who make a living today making "beats", selling stock commercial licences, amd creating scores for small budget projects will be out of a job. It will happen, no doubt in my mind.
youtube
2023-02-06T23:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugz0XjMK2unMuXw5OxJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxSG_NgiwCSdlhFEb94AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzd4C3wdAjxTo7SgGB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwQwoBbhNaV1qMeQEZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzp8tI-PaGcWV0mDv94AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxt6SlKKtkqgyGCLjN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyJjQFre1t4mQvtgex4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxkDtRrJ958mBgr7uh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxWTYRgaA0s2PJtO_94AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxa6KumiBtVaclhukl4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}
]