Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
You are coming from the wrong starting point. I don't care if AI is spitting my …
ytc_UgzBvgjhR…
G
@otimjoshua3366 Honestly, I am fine with that as long as you don’t consider your…
ytr_UgweLD0Tu…
G
I'm a software dev. I use AI as a tool but you can really tell when a coworker j…
ytr_UgzTo8JaP…
G
AI will ENABLE the mark of the beast but is not actually the MOTB.
Most people …
ytr_UgyzY7gHB…
G
Unfortunately she will not win. It’s a deepfake of just her face put on someone …
ytc_UgzskH3YY…
G
To be fair, every photo compound in AI generated art must be pay to 1st hand cre…
ytc_Ugzf-Bit0…
G
First time using claude and is bullshit can’t enter a stupid link in canva or dr…
ytc_Ugw1qoZ2a…
G
I think ai should be governed the same way we govern the united States some kind…
ytc_UgwxCvW0p…
Comment
I will never say that the speaker, who is an AI researcher, is going to destroy the world. A tool is neutral, cannot destroy humans. Only humans can destroy humans.
As she said, AI has bias which is influenced by the algorithms. That means we can manipulate AI by making large amounts of lies, in order to fool some people.
This speech is hilarious to me. The speaker found that some AI tools are unreliable and she, therefore, invented AI tools to check the liabilities and integrities of other AI tools. But, what if there is bug or limitation in the aforementioned machine invented by her? I predict that she will, therefore, invent more AI tools to counter-check the liabilities and integrities of the former AI tools developed by her, which determine the liabilities and integrities of other AI tools. It sounds like a technological Ponzi Scheme.
If so, in the future, she will have ten different suggestions and opinions on her desk, which are given by ten different AI tools. What she needs to do is to exercise due diligence and make independent judgement, which she did decades ago, when there was no AI.
youtube
AI Responsibility
2025-04-11T03:4…
♥ 4
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgzMB4jDSV5f8EWKP2h4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwNh4QHLHBKyZJw7D54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwWQyQl0B7OLkSyZzZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgywmlxWsma34kVeM8x4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyOGZrl93zkHGHdDwJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw1D9JqBrVaiJiYau54AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyX-76Brm87Xft2k2J4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgySIonD_SuJNxE3xfl4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxVYdkAl0q0R867jPt4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzQH8-xvXlGFmqz9rd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"unclear"}
]