Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
This is my view as well. LLMs are incredible in their own right at certain tasks…
rdc_n812lqr
G
So should I wait to go to college to become an accountant until AI takes over an…
ytc_UgxROpfgC…
G
If have an intelligence superior to ours I’m a firm believer it wouldn’t need us…
ytc_UgyXlSXp1…
G
Racist AI is awesome and you want to program the AI to be biased against whites.…
ytc_UgxgclGx8…
G
I paint warhammer style minis and do bigger statuettes and dioramas as well. I h…
ytc_UgyqUB1o3…
G
That doesn't make sense. They sell attention to advertisers - that's how youtube…
ytr_UgzjvarUF…
G
Haha, that's a classic episode! It’s funny how pop culture often portrays robots…
ytr_UgzKCY2S1…
G
sad how people have to make AI instead of taking time and enjoying the process o…
ytc_UgxVEJV1I…
Comment
I will never say that the speaker, who is an AI researcher, is going to destroy the world. A tool is neutral, cannot destroy humans. Only humans can destroy humans.
As she said, AI has bias which is influenced by the algorithms. That means we can manipulate AI by making large amounts of lies, in order to fool some people.
This speech is hilarious to me. The speaker found that some AI tools are unreliable and she, therefore, invented AI tools to check the liabilities and integrities of other AI tools. But, what if there is bug or limitation in the aforementioned machine invented by her? I predict that she will, therefore, invent more AI tools to counter-check the liabilities and integrities of the former AI tools developed by her, which determine the liabilities and integrities of other AI tools. It sounds like a technological Ponzi Scheme.
If so, in the future, she will have ten different suggestions and opinions on her desk, which are given by ten different AI tools. What she needs to do is to exercise due diligence and make independent judgement, which she did decades ago, when there was no AI.
youtube
AI Responsibility
2025-04-11T03:4…
♥ 4
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgzMB4jDSV5f8EWKP2h4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwNh4QHLHBKyZJw7D54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwWQyQl0B7OLkSyZzZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgywmlxWsma34kVeM8x4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyOGZrl93zkHGHdDwJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw1D9JqBrVaiJiYau54AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyX-76Brm87Xft2k2J4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgySIonD_SuJNxE3xfl4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxVYdkAl0q0R867jPt4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzQH8-xvXlGFmqz9rd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"unclear"}
]