Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G Hey, AI research scientist here. Wholeheartedly agree with the video. Shoehornin… ytc_Ugy8l9nRZ… G All they gotta do is make it an opt in system and pay out royalties. It would ma… ytc_UgzRymbHx… G Again ESIX systems are 100% safe based on mathematics and geometry, based on sta… ytc_Ugy8WlHUX… G The biggest part no one understands is that even if you go out of your way to av… ytc_UgwCFCL9r… G problems with traditional art: none problems with digital art: none problems wit… ytc_Ugx75T_ll… G Yep. Popular opinion being if you use any ai for writing code you’re not a real … rdc_nt75j8x G The day we get AI restriction is the day AI can replace billionaires and CEOs… ytc_UgyIZxh0B… G If anything this make automation/A.I writers more appealing to investors. Time t… ytc_UgxOw8Y1b…

Comment

I will never say that the speaker, who is an AI researcher, is going to destroy the world. A tool is neutral, cannot destroy humans. Only humans can destroy humans. As she said, AI has bias which is influenced by the algorithms. That means we can manipulate AI by making large amounts of lies, in order to fool some people. This speech is hilarious to me. The speaker found that some AI tools are unreliable and she, therefore, invented AI tools to check the liabilities and integrities of other AI tools. But, what if there is bug or limitation in the aforementioned machine invented by her? I predict that she will, therefore, invent more AI tools to counter-check the liabilities and integrities of the former AI tools developed by her, which determine the liabilities and integrities of other AI tools. It sounds like a technological Ponzi Scheme. If so, in the future, she will have ten different suggestions and opinions on her desk, which are given by ten different AI tools. What she needs to do is to exercise due diligence and make independent judgement, which she did decades ago, when there was no AI.

youtube AI Responsibility 2025-04-11T03:4… ♥ 4

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	none
Reasoning	deontological
Policy	none
Emotion	indifference
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_UgzMB4jDSV5f8EWKP2h4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwNh4QHLHBKyZJw7D54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwWQyQl0B7OLkSyZzZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgywmlxWsma34kVeM8x4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyOGZrl93zkHGHdDwJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw1D9JqBrVaiJiYau54AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyX-76Brm87Xft2k2J4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgySIonD_SuJNxE3xfl4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxVYdkAl0q0R867jPt4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzQH8-xvXlGFmqz9rd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"unclear"}
]

Raw LLM Responses