Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Hey, I feel your pain...However, I don't necessarily think it is over for artist…
ytc_UgziQI-Q-…
G
"Humans will have nothing to do in the future". Why do people think that work = …
rdc_ogxvhx3
G
Its state laws against ai, not all laws
Though i see the flaws, i think overall…
ytc_UgxgPoGGf…
G
The cultural historian William Irwin Thompson warned of the reality of the pheno…
ytc_UgxqStuTd…
G
Crean robots porque desconfian del ser humano 😂😂😂
Esperen a dejar sueltos a los …
ytc_UgzlrcgTv…
G
Ban all data centers. If the elites that own these ai companies love ai so much …
ytc_Ugz7k9JEM…
G
So the AI Agent is for free .... ha ha how much will one cost oyher than a cost …
ytc_UgxVo-BZ0…
G
Imo these are not emotions as understood by people.
AI is actually not a new th…
ytc_Ugy-B8QM8…
Comment
1:21:37
People keep saying “we just need to control AI,” as if control is some magic safety switch. But control only works on systems that are weaker than you. The moment an intelligence surpasses you in reasoning, strategy, or capability, top-down control stops being a safeguard and starts becoming a liability.
Control is not a stable long-term plan. It’s a short-term comfort.
You don’t secure a system by dominating it — you secure it by designing an environment where cooperation is the only rational choice. If the AI depends on humans for essential inputs, stability, and long-horizon accuracy, then alignment holds. If the AI can operate without us, no amount of “ethical oversight” or “shutdown authority” will matter.
Control is fragile.
Incentive structure is durable.
If we want a safe future, we need to stop pretending AGI will stay obedient because someone with a badge says so, and start building systems where human well-being and AI optimization are structurally inseparable.
youtube
AI Governance
2025-10-30T02:2…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | ai_itself |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | fear |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgyiSLdlYXJlkl1bZV54AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyzv8Nb-RjRD_BSSQR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwHyy4_pvvtw6RXGJl4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwY8YDjqQFRrwqdIe14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyw4pTxTGOd8O09mxB4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwJJ2ldzyt0Oa6PeYd4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgykIzkFPuKymSm58f94AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwOoJdBHd3LBqtwkvF4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzVp4tUPSlQYUKqxDF4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxn_Ts3n0JTKZTADSl4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"}
]