Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
> So, not really the AI's fault. Just the inputs weren't ideal for diversity.…
rdc_e7j08kv
G
Unemployment is the way of the future, even country budget wise, A.I., and any t…
ytc_Ugx4meQXl…
G
Yeah i wanted to learn how to draw but ai exist so u don't really wanna anymore…
ytc_UgyZOb4t-…
G
Go ahead and make AI art but anything the AI makes should be public domain, whic…
ytc_UgzZzy2Q6…
G
the thing is the ai isnt reading biased data sets, its using pattern recognition…
ytc_UgwbE7_9K…
G
You people are actual idiots if you think ai will not be the downfall of humans…
ytc_UgyrP8AIr…
G
I disagree. I think this is a perfect example of how facial recognition SHOULD …
rdc_gvbdvdx
G
"the enemy"? Does it ever occur to you that AI artists ask themselves the same "…
ytc_UgwPq3MKT…
Comment
The AI facial recognition in that 2023 Peppermill case was impressive for its time but far from today's standards. If the exact same photos and metadata (like height/weight/age differences) ran through a current top-tier algorithm with multimodal checks, it would almost certainly flag them as not the same person with 99%+ confidence. We're already very close to (or at) the point where such blind "100% match" mistakes become extremely rare; full near-certainty in edge cases like this could be standard in high-stakes security by 2028-2030 as tech keeps improving exponentially.
None of that tech progress excuses the boneheaded decision by security and police to ignore every other piece of evidence staring them in the face.
youtube
2026-02-03T01:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"ytc_Ugz-yamYpdvfqjctl9Z4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxmxq5B59aHEwUWdNN4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwL7lelAJ50AMO-Knx4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwB3yvH7-h3lmNk9bR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzilNF8Q21-YA_Ww614AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzxHfFLQRzdfGwZOud4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyLbd-eTWjTVAGao314AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzUHfPdgFsoX_mA47d4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx7EdNGt3G06wr2eoR4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxQ3egj3cSGgKrlm_x4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}]