Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
So yes, you are a luddite. Especially since you want to sabotage the AI models s…
ytr_UgxlXQl_-…
G
Honestly this design is ideal, storage bins not moving makes all the difference,…
ytc_UgxdzQjz8…
G
don't ever make a robot or AI that "want" something if programmers want to keep …
ytc_Ugyf_bO2a…
G
You are abusing that poor AI. Lol I can just picture it raging in its own way. …
rdc_ktut8pz
G
I agree, though the committee will very quickly achieve confluence in 'optimal e…
ytr_Ugwzi43lM…
G
Great summary of the bs regarding AI or a better term technical intelligence, TI…
ytc_Ugzg6lzJ3…
G
Lets replace Bill, AI gives much better answers than he:
The imbalance is real…
ytc_UgxL3ftAV…
G
There is a journalist who released information about four robots with artificial…
ytr_UgwG8s0oQ…
Comment
The AI facial recognition in that 2023 Peppermill case was impressive for its time but far from today's standards. If the exact same photos and metadata (like height/weight/age differences) ran through a current top-tier algorithm with multimodal checks, it would almost certainly flag them as not the same person with 99%+ confidence. We're already very close to (or at) the point where such blind "100% match" mistakes become extremely rare; full near-certainty in edge cases like this could be standard in high-stakes security by 2028-2030 as tech keeps improving exponentially.
None of that tech progress excuses the boneheaded decision by security and police to ignore every other piece of evidence staring them in the face.
youtube
2026-02-03T01:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"ytc_Ugz-yamYpdvfqjctl9Z4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxmxq5B59aHEwUWdNN4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwL7lelAJ50AMO-Knx4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwB3yvH7-h3lmNk9bR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzilNF8Q21-YA_Ww614AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzxHfFLQRzdfGwZOud4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyLbd-eTWjTVAGao314AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzUHfPdgFsoX_mA47d4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx7EdNGt3G06wr2eoR4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxQ3egj3cSGgKrlm_x4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}]