Raw LLM Responses

As awful as it is insinuating that people with disability need AI to write something... I also find it grossly inaccurate, seeing how actively writing was something that helped someone I know, someone who has bad dyslexia, to this day. I was a Grammar tutor for a bit and I used to have my students try NaNoWriMo (the young writer's program) as homework/on the side. There was no expectation that they had to share their writing and no negatives to not finishing or not reaching whatever goal they had set (I believe I asked 20k of them, but it could have been less); it was to see what writing felt like, what storycrafting did for them. Was NaNo for all of them? No. Did it help them? Yeah. I had four students the year I asked the NaNo homework of them and their writing improved with just the act of writing, itself. One of those former students writes regularly, now (the same dyslexic person mentioned earlier) and their reading and writing levels both increased greatly since they started writing. NaNo wasn't a cure, by any means, but it was a great tool to get the ball rolling on their interest in writing. This is to say: even writing poorly can benefit you. You know what can't? Having AI write instead of you. Like, sure, use AI to generate prompts, help you rephrase something you're having trouble with, edit what you've written, tell you strengths/weaknesses of a passage you wrote. Use it as a tool, the way you might use MS Word's Grammar tools of yore. But don't have AI do the writing for you. It benefits you to do that part, I promise. Even if it's hard and things don't come out the way you want them to, it's worthwhile to do the work yourself. (There are probably folks who dont even like the idea of using AI for prompts, editing, or critique, but I'm firmly in the "AI is a tool" category and don't find anything wrong with use of AI for those things.)