Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
@thecreativeducky5781 It doesn't matter, we still can't call our-self artist bec…
ytr_Ugyl5qW9O…
G
I don't know if anybody has noticed, but there has been an interstellar spacecra…
ytc_UgwvkiohK…
G
I did that a long time ago. I asked if there was ever a pope that changed the ye…
ytc_Ugy7MesK2…
G
Bernie, you old fart. No it won't. AI is a fad, and it's going away as soon as i…
ytc_UgxaLD7f_…
G
Imagine for a second that the software fails, the GPS malfunctions, there is a p…
ytc_UgxDYdZ3s…
G
If people are being replaced by AI who is going to buy their products when peopl…
ytc_Ugw2t6svm…
G
It's funny how these AI slop promptoids will try to bash artists for "not drawin…
ytc_UgwmG5ggX…
G
1. What do you think the opposition to „AI” is? THAT is what adapting means! Mee…
ytr_Ugyw9elzT…
Comment
Okay, let's try to think about it. Let's be optimistic and assume we reach 50% unemployment, not the 99% we're talking about. At that point, how many people won't be able to afford a car? Sales would collapse catastrophically. Therefore, there would no longer be any need to produce many cars, profits would collapse, maintaining a production chain would become too costly, manufacturers would have to raise prices to compensate for the lost sales, and so they would sell even fewer. Producing cars would become pointless and uneconomical. Because while on the one hand, producers are needed, on the other, consumers are needed, those who buy the goods and services offered, regardless of whether they are produced by humans or robots. So wouldn't it be an economic system that would ultimately compensate itself? Humans are needed, because robots and AI are not consumers; without our human needs, artificial entities have no reason to exist. So the problem doesn't actually seem that serious to me. Or am I wrong? Please clarify my doubts!!!
youtube
AI Governance
2025-10-25T16:1…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | unclear |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | unclear |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"ytc_Ugyg6U2aA6M7auQodnR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},{"id":"ytc_UgxKQUiPErPeb-aNtVh4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},{"id":"ytc_Ugyi1GRimpd9fW7aX_B4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},{"id":"ytc_Ugw0q8J-LjqfP3vWEat4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},{"id":"ytc_Ugz9TMACLxJaV25b5Hd4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},{"id":"ytc_UgzTaQ3KyBMDLOO2eaF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},{"id":"ytc_UgyJnueEQ8KzVEWoXKF4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},{"id":"ytc_UgxbW2k8OlXDWmGoXP54AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},{"id":"ytc_UgwElWTxLgiPk9MhxyF4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},{"id":"ytc_UgwIz96HpTIk1y1cIA54AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"]}