Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
AI is a magic show with no experience.
I have always believed it would be a help…
ytc_UgxMQUrhv…
G
AIs should be the ones blacksmithing. Humans should be making creative pieces so…
ytr_Ugz3rqFdC…
G
Why would AI end humanity?
Ask AI for the plan to benefit humanity instead of de…
ytc_UgyTA9b8x…
G
Nothing about this process is actually creative though. In reality this algorith…
ytc_Ugyh-_d4n…
G
As inspiring as you're trying to make this, I partly disagree with your conclusi…
ytc_UgyhCR9EA…
G
Collage art is basically the same thing as ai art.
Just because someone like Cyr…
ytc_Ugx5yUT_v…
G
If ai puts everyone out of work there will be no money for people to buy whateve…
ytc_UgyzAKkMX…
G
There isnt one single commentator that thinks AI is a good thing coming that wil…
ytc_Ugy9wgMy0…
Comment
Okay, let's try to think about it. Let's be optimistic and assume we reach 50% unemployment, not the 99% we're talking about. At that point, how many people won't be able to afford a car? Sales would collapse catastrophically. Therefore, there would no longer be any need to produce many cars, profits would collapse, maintaining a production chain would become too costly, manufacturers would have to raise prices to compensate for the lost sales, and so they would sell even fewer. Producing cars would become pointless and uneconomical. Because while on the one hand, producers are needed, on the other, consumers are needed, those who buy the goods and services offered, regardless of whether they are produced by humans or robots. So wouldn't it be an economic system that would ultimately compensate itself? Humans are needed, because robots and AI are not consumers; without our human needs, artificial entities have no reason to exist. So the problem doesn't actually seem that serious to me. Or am I wrong? Please clarify my doubts!!!
youtube
AI Governance
2025-10-25T16:1…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | unclear |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | unclear |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"ytc_Ugyg6U2aA6M7auQodnR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},{"id":"ytc_UgxKQUiPErPeb-aNtVh4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},{"id":"ytc_Ugyi1GRimpd9fW7aX_B4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},{"id":"ytc_Ugw0q8J-LjqfP3vWEat4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},{"id":"ytc_Ugz9TMACLxJaV25b5Hd4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},{"id":"ytc_UgzTaQ3KyBMDLOO2eaF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},{"id":"ytc_UgyJnueEQ8KzVEWoXKF4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},{"id":"ytc_UgxbW2k8OlXDWmGoXP54AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},{"id":"ytc_UgwElWTxLgiPk9MhxyF4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},{"id":"ytc_UgwIz96HpTIk1y1cIA54AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"]}