Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Born in the 80s here- I have getting accused of being a chat bot for Decades...…
ytc_Ugy82kA7-…
G
The only medical thing I use AI for is helping it generate questions for me to a…
ytc_Ugwy8KRyh…
G
Typing/writing is an art, as long as you aren't throwing a few sentences into AI…
ytr_UgxQMOFtO…
G
AI won’t kill jobs but the PEOPLE who govern and build such systems can (if they…
ytc_Ugxs3-Piw…
G
Everybody with a decent degree in computer science knows that AI applications ar…
ytc_Ugxu3SFTb…
G
This post + our new reel = ✨chef’s kiss✨
We explain how to flip ChatGPT from Q&A…
ytc_UgxmLNblv…
G
If you think about it gen AI is just a fancy compression algorithm with search f…
ytc_UgzT3MkwB…
G
Stuff like this is an endless battle someone cracks the code to something we fix…
ytr_UgzYD3bsY…
Comment
More efficient is better in my opinion. If an AI can do a better job at lower cost compared to a human why not choose the AI? I mean it would be lowering costs increasing profit margins which is what companies are all out and there is nothing wrong with that. I think the only problem would be the generation or two of transition as we go from labor jobs to more creative jobs. Computers as they stand now are great for logic and problem solving, but I have yet to see (with my minimal exposure to any such things that may exists excuse my ignorance) a computer that solves visual puzzles with ease. Working as a team of AI and Humans there is so much more we both together could accomplish. Why not do that, why not take the next step? No reason to stop something that brings a lot to the table and yes some will be hard to deal with but lets face it our economy in America and only speaking for America and not any other country, is bad without AI. I say lets have AI do the number crunching and not let our politicians keep jerking us around as it would only serve as another check and balance politically.
youtube
2014-12-12T02:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | industry_self |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugh5gFy9d-aImngCoAEC","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UghJqPLW6Vw7XngCoAEC","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UghU5_fkiifjLXgCoAEC","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgjNDSMMJw40vHgCoAEC","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UggIJNl8KWoVkXgCoAEC","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgjXoPJGX56VAHgCoAEC","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugj2Xvf20e4n83gCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugjj4tsAFi-2U3gCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ughk8KTVoPwfoHgCoAEC","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugjl0ZmjjMygnHgCoAEC","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"}
]