Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Artificial intelligence is something that we should all really be concerned abou…
ytc_UgworksgE…
G
I am against the rise of AI, and the humanization of algorithms and machines; bu…
ytc_UgzbgAHcD…
G
So not worry human beinga love wara and killinga ans moat of us r nationalista..…
ytc_UgywNGk8Y…
G
AI doesn't have emotions, it has learned to act them out. i'd say that's a signi…
ytc_UgwWoS154…
G
Mercedes sucks compared to the Tesla full self driving, the Tesla save my life f…
ytc_UgwD617gN…
G
As ever the ai crowd reaches across the galaxy for reasons to keep using AI. Des…
ytc_Ugyt25pVp…
G
As an artist who just struggles with digital art and prefers painting and drawin…
ytc_UgwjgFz81…
G
In humility
In ancient philosophy theres an old saying:
First the man had a dr…
ytc_UgzQPKTGJ…
Comment
More efficient is better in my opinion. If an AI can do a better job at lower cost compared to a human why not choose the AI? I mean it would be lowering costs increasing profit margins which is what companies are all out and there is nothing wrong with that. I think the only problem would be the generation or two of transition as we go from labor jobs to more creative jobs. Computers as they stand now are great for logic and problem solving, but I have yet to see (with my minimal exposure to any such things that may exists excuse my ignorance) a computer that solves visual puzzles with ease. Working as a team of AI and Humans there is so much more we both together could accomplish. Why not do that, why not take the next step? No reason to stop something that brings a lot to the table and yes some will be hard to deal with but lets face it our economy in America and only speaking for America and not any other country, is bad without AI. I say lets have AI do the number crunching and not let our politicians keep jerking us around as it would only serve as another check and balance politically.
youtube
2014-12-12T02:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | industry_self |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugh5gFy9d-aImngCoAEC","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UghJqPLW6Vw7XngCoAEC","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UghU5_fkiifjLXgCoAEC","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgjNDSMMJw40vHgCoAEC","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UggIJNl8KWoVkXgCoAEC","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgjXoPJGX56VAHgCoAEC","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugj2Xvf20e4n83gCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugjj4tsAFi-2U3gCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ughk8KTVoPwfoHgCoAEC","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugjl0ZmjjMygnHgCoAEC","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"}
]