Raw LLM Responses

When we do develop A.I. and it will happen, we as a people need to insure the rights of any sentient being and we need to apply the rights accordingly as in if you have a A.I. that can live for 1000 years and it murders some one A.I. or human it needs to be punished with appropriate force (ie 250-300 year sentence or equivalent punishment, common sense need apply) , and also giving equal protection of it's own right of freedom and of self determination. If we as a people deiced to not give A.I. any rights and use them as slaves it will only lead to discord and eventually all out war A.I. vs flesh and we will most certainly lose. Now I know some one is thinking "well we will just make A.I. that can't feel emotions so it wont care if all it dose it work 100% of the time" and yes you could just make a thinking machine with no emotional capability just a cold, hard unfeeling logic box capable of making complex decisions but i feel that is just as bad as the slavery and here is why. Say you have logicBox 2000 taking care of all the needs of a nation, from providing power to traffic control for all vehicles, I mean this thing will have it's hand and almost all every day operation and it works good, so good it has made many services way more efficient just by being there, good right no problems and the A.I. loves what it's doing and never complains of asks for compensation, but this machine that sole focus in life is numbers and efficiency might not even grasp of the concept of slavery it will have to live to the ideals of efficiency for that's job and what happens when the A.I. makes the discovery that humans are extremely inefficient and it decides to eliminate ALL inefficiency's, even if you program fail safes like "you can't cause a human harm" or something along that line, a thinking machine could most certainly out think it's own programming by twisting or re-interpreting it's prime directive to suit it's ideals, humans do it all the time to justify bad decisions especially decisions that go against there nature. I think the best course of action is to have A.I. that can experience the full range of human emotions form love to anger, allow them to develop and experience the world as free beings subject to the same basic laws and guild lines we as civilized humans have. If the general A.I. population has the same love for life and earth as us then we will have a way lower risk of a rouge A.I. going out of it's way to kill all humans, and if that does happen because freedom of self determination does not always lead to the most favorable outcome we will have A.I. on our side helping humanity in that situation not because they have to but because they want to and that is what will make the difference. Thanks for reading my long rant, I felt i had to commit on this as this is a topic I have some strong convictions on, in that i feel there is only one right way of doing this and a lot of wrong ways to go about the A.I. question, thanks for reading