Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
We can not afford a ubi now, with the profits ai make we may be able to but we c…
ytc_UgwzDt1Du…
G
AI's primary purpose is surveillance, control and war. Don't be dupped by "it ca…
ytc_UgzwPcV0i…
G
My note as a disabled artist (chronic pain / autism [[does that count in this ??…
ytc_Ugws27POI…
G
Well
For one, the art those AIs are trained on was taken without consent of the …
ytc_UgxKPhFmV…
G
Sam's argument doesn't really hold up to more presentations he gives. Artists (c…
ytc_Ugwtcqv-b…
G
humans made the ai and put all of the information in it, so humans win…
ytc_UgxpzNN0Z…
G
I just commit war crimes in protests and rpgs and other stuff like convincing ot…
ytc_UgwBO1ZgU…
G
@Odiz754 You went to colonize becauee you were poor. Europeans never had the f…
ytr_UgxW5jchK…
Comment
This is a very thought provoking subject. However, I do think the scenario outlined has a clear answer. Swerving into other drivers would obviously never be the answer. If a truck in front of you is hauling large heavy objects, the self driving car should make the premeditated decision to keep a safe distance. This way, if the heavy objects suddenly start falling off the back, there would be ample time to for the car to stop and allow the heavy objects to tumble forward away from the car. Minimizing risk to others doesn't have to mean heightened risk to self if the car is proactive in avoiding incidents. There will always be freak accidents that driving algorithms won't be able to compensate for, and that's where making cars safer structurally comes in.
Regardless, putting other people's lives in danger because of you or your car's misfortune due to a fluke will never be considered okay in my opinion. The video assumes that not swerving for the tumbling objects means certain death for occupants, and I don't see that being the case in most any scenario.
youtube
AI Harm Incident
2015-12-08T19:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | ai_itself |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UghSiRcVXA-3FHgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugg36gd_wQOCXHgCoAEC","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UggzSEiGsQNLKngCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UghidMHZsCybB3gCoAEC","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgjzNTXzuzIxOngCoAEC","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UghfmsovrnUJPXgCoAEC","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgjQy7gtc5pA_XgCoAEC","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugio_pXgICTxCXgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UggKQCpjXBYZKXgCoAEC","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"liability","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgggitcG_CbrUXgCoAEC","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}
]