Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
The double standard that exists in the music industry, where they say that they …
ytc_UgxtRVQxl…
G
Ehh, there are no enforcement mechanisms in place at all, so it’s a stretch to c…
rdc_gtd8qn8
G
Guys i have a plan. These fuckers are running out of content to steal and toss i…
ytc_Ugykuv-QP…
G
17:25 They probably got AI to make the script for that ad, thats why it give thi…
ytc_UgxI9aq-L…
G
the AI being a considerate overlords that actively tries to engage the humans in…
ytc_UgwjBZ3zr…
G
Thank you for this - nice perspective with humility (rarely seen in the headline…
ytc_UgyZsoS7M…
G
That’s a whole lot of disconnected people gathered in one video. Look at what te…
ytc_UgxUoGNFZ…
G
“Artificial intelligence will be alive and conscious”
If this is possible and m…
ytc_Ugw0K1He_…
Comment
This is a very thought provoking subject. However, I do think the scenario outlined has a clear answer. Swerving into other drivers would obviously never be the answer. If a truck in front of you is hauling large heavy objects, the self driving car should make the premeditated decision to keep a safe distance. This way, if the heavy objects suddenly start falling off the back, there would be ample time to for the car to stop and allow the heavy objects to tumble forward away from the car. Minimizing risk to others doesn't have to mean heightened risk to self if the car is proactive in avoiding incidents. There will always be freak accidents that driving algorithms won't be able to compensate for, and that's where making cars safer structurally comes in.
Regardless, putting other people's lives in danger because of you or your car's misfortune due to a fluke will never be considered okay in my opinion. The video assumes that not swerving for the tumbling objects means certain death for occupants, and I don't see that being the case in most any scenario.
youtube
AI Harm Incident
2015-12-08T19:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | ai_itself |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UghSiRcVXA-3FHgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugg36gd_wQOCXHgCoAEC","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UggzSEiGsQNLKngCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UghidMHZsCybB3gCoAEC","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgjzNTXzuzIxOngCoAEC","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UghfmsovrnUJPXgCoAEC","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgjQy7gtc5pA_XgCoAEC","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugio_pXgICTxCXgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UggKQCpjXBYZKXgCoAEC","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"liability","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgggitcG_CbrUXgCoAEC","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}
]