Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
As a human, I opt out. Invasion of privacy. Should have to opt in, not have to g…
ytc_Ugw7NmoI3…
G
If America could only put as much protective measures in place for guns as they …
ytc_UgwolnLRr…
G
😒🙄 I guess they going to keep posting fake videos to control the narrative. so w…
ytc_Ugw5wiv-Y…
G
That's the problem. Assuming that the data sets are biased is itself a potential…
ytr_Ugwh3Ku74…
G
Too bad, the Ai Companies can pay more...plus they aren't hollywood liberals...s…
rdc_micblpl
G
It does feel like I tend to get better answers when I'm polite to the AI. So I'l…
ytc_UgwjWDeMn…
G
The power of unification, artificial intelligence unifies it sounds like in the …
ytc_UgwGhrXx1…
G
@sammy45654565 I don't think that's how it works or that's what his views are. "…
ytr_UgyY5iyOM…
Comment
In the absence of both an attorney and a client, talking about attorney-client privilege would be weird. But obviously chats are private data and should not be accessed by third parties.
The real problem here is the fact a user -deleted chat was not actually deleted. I guess that's a part of the long text above the "I agree" button everyone clicks without reading, but if not - OpenAI should be sued.
The practical conclusion - for sensitive stuff, do not use LLMs from an account that can be linked to you.
reddit
Viral AI Reaction
1776933492.0
♥ 2
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"rdc_ohx6zwo","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_ohrrdzi","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"rdc_ohs9n61","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_oht7dtq","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"rdc_ohu4ljs","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}
]