Raw LLM Responses

That is really nice idea, but in practice, it is not the users that need to be persuaded like this, but Firefox CEO instead. I truly believe that Firefox is going to stay as a scapegoat company to cover "we don't have monopoly, there is an alternative ". If you want to have more Firefox users, then it must be more appealing to the frontend developers. I am a backend developer and every frontend colleague of mine doesn't even consider Firefox when they are testing their code. Those who do are very rare. In the company where I work, fixes for Firefox are done only when someone reports it. Why that is the case? There is a number of frontend technologies in which Firefox is lacking. Find videos on you tube explained by the frontend devs when they say why it is hard to love Firefox. Instead of acting as a corporate giant on the level of Google, Firefox should reduce their scope and focus on what is best for the web browsing, pushing the frontier of that. Now, with AI slop hate, Firefox is adding AI in the browser. This could have been an option for those who want to install it as some add-on. This pushes Firefox further and further from adoption. I personally use Firefox for my bank account but for everything else I use Vivaldi which is perfect for my needs and they are hard core against AI in a browser. I know that they are not FOSS and Chromium based, but they also fight ads and ability to install ad blockers like uBlockOrigin in addition to their native ad blocking. Apart from that, Vivaldi is a whole class above any other browser for my productivity needs with built in features (first and best implementation of Workspaces, stacked tabs, proper memory management, tiled browsing...) all of which I use daily. So, the idea for me to make Firefox as a primary browser is really really not happening unless Firefox itself go trough fundamental pivot in their browser development strategy. Especially not now when I run away from AI. I moved away from Windows to Linux M