Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
@HonestElk22 i have no problems with your family buddy. yes you can be an artis…
ytr_Ugxm-IjuC…
G
I’m always surprised that in the “AI vs Humanity” discussions that the option of…
ytc_UgyL5gOk0…
G
If there’s any concerns over AI auto me it’s more people wanting to get lazier. …
ytc_UgxicOjDL…
G
Art is about trail and error. Asking existencial questions. Expressing ideas abo…
ytc_Ugy7agrdl…
G
On the surface, this sounds like a plausible future but it overlooks the massive…
ytc_UgwOw47HU…
G
Ya'll need to understand that AI is designed to give answers it thinks you want.…
ytc_Ugx8v0z-K…
G
Regardless of the nature of activity, an AI doesn't have to outcompete the best …
ytc_Ugw6MqoZP…
G
"I" and "ChatGPT" are two different entities. ChatGPT is a family of models with…
ytc_UgzcHr1pH…
Comment
It's upsetting to me just how much private interests have ruined all the cool shit about technology.
AI and other tech could be an otherworldly improvement to everyone's quality of life. The productivity increase could mean we can work less and enjoy our lives more. Outsourcing of menial labour could mean we can spend more time doing interesting things. I'd even bet artists would be less opposed to AI art if it didn't actively threaten their livelihoods. If they could make art for art's sake rather than having to do it to feed themselves, derivative work might be more flattering and allow them to push their own creativity and artistic boundaries further.
I'm a programmer. One of my first jobs involved working on a piece of accounting software. What this *should* have meant was that accountants in the firm could spend less time working and spend less time on dumb data entry tasks. What this actually meant was that the company could now afford to get by with fewer accountants and pocket the difference.
I miss the days where I was optimistic about technology. When all this stuff was new and niche, when the internet was almost an anarchist collective in the way that things were run. Then we got all these capitalist psychopaths who realized that the massive quality of life improvement could instead be traded in for ungodly profit margins.
AI could be *so* fucking cool and useful and a general quality of life improvement for everyone. And all these billionaire pricks keep selling it as if it's going to be used for that. But we know it will just be another way to transfer wealth and power to the ruling class.
I think our societies have to make a choice here. We can accept that this is what we're doing now and take on our roles as modern day serfs. If we don't want to do that, we have to, we *have to* take this shit from them by force. These tools are built on publicly funded research done by universities; these companies only adopt them once the profit motive exis
reddit
AI Governance
1757081808.0
♥ 247
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | utilitarian |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:06:44.921194 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"rdc_ncasf7u","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_nck6p65","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_ncvosf1","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"rdc_ndlhpu3","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_ndwib06","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]