Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
The Vancouver & Portland area has an alarming amount of space for lease, the ric…
ytc_UgxGxxA5W…
G
I disagree about Google not needing regulations. They definitely play the algori…
ytc_UgxRBUKo6…
G
I was thinking something along these lines. "So, you mean to say that the AI you…
ytr_Ugzx4tSv_…
G
This kinda gives me the same vibes as the interviews shown at the begining of "I…
ytc_UgzoRsptV…
G
Here's what I've learnt from trying midjourney (to generate references for makin…
ytc_UgxGF9OZY…
G
I hope everyone can see it is painfully obvious this comment was generated by AI…
ytr_Ugws_ktHY…
G
I understand where you're coming from! Sophia can come off as a bit confident, b…
ytr_UgyJ4n5bO…
G
Personaly as an artist, my stance on AI was based on my believe that if someth…
ytr_UgwtodGoi…
Comment
LLM's should never be used to evaluate résumés. It is as easy as that. There are way too many problems atm:
1. As mentioned the LLM will have bias from its training data
2. Future training data can get polluted by the LLM's reinforcing the bias.
3. It is a black box. We can't explain how it made the decision so how can HR justify using it? What if they are accused of breaking the law?
4. If these LLM's get popular companies start hiring using very similar patterns. If discrimination is bad now imagine all companies discriminating in the exact same way against the same people. We could end up with some people being unable to get a job for having the wrong name or date of birth
5. Companies can and absolutely will get accused of forming a cartel because they use the same LLM. It isn't that different than directly working together for price fixing instead it happens on the hiring side.
There are probably many more issues ...
reddit
AI Bias
1730492102.0
♥ 157
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | ban |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"rdc_luwvnwc","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_luwz8l5","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"rdc_luzsin6","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"rdc_lv1gtup","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"rdc_luxtq7d","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"}
]