Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Comment
Voice actors are not the issue in the negotiations here. From the article: "SAG-AFTRA chief contracts officer Ray Rodriguez said that the bargaining companies initially wanted to offer protections to voice, not motion performers. “So anybody doing a stunt or creature performance, all those folks would have been left unprotected under the employers’ offer,” Rodriguez said in an interview with Aftermath. Rodriguez said that the companies later extended protections to motion performers, but only if “the performer is identifiable in the output of the AI digital replica.”" I'm on the side of the companies here. This feels very reasonable.
reddit AI Jobs 1722951701.0 ♥ 6
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitynone
Reasoningunclear
Policynone
Emotionindifference
Coded at2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"rdc_lgrqljv","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"rdc_lgs22sw","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"rdc_lgreleu","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"rdc_lgrik3x","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"rdc_lgrkq2e","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"} ]