Raw LLM Responses

> Also people were arguing that existing non-consentual porn laws and rulings should cover this type of shit being done with AI since the law has already addressed photomanipulation via photoshop This is not unreasonable, but it's not unreasonable to expect laws to be updated for completely new technology either. It's always better to have clear, comprehensive laws than to throw outdated laws around the courts in the hopes that they will divine something appropriate, which can then be overturned anyways and is liable to all sorts of judicial stupidity like [court shopping](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forum_shopping). The courts interpret the law, the executive implements the law, but the parliament can (and should) write better law.