Raw LLM Responses

I disagree, you can't have privacy topics without touching on the security of how and why it happened. There'd be nothing to learn from. Just because the headline of an article posted says security update is bogus or company name was hacked doesn't mean it's not a privacy issue. For all you know you just installed boot level signed malware so now you're never going to be secure **or private**. Or that the company did in fact lose a large portion of plaintext data even though the article says it was hacked. I agree on a case by case basis safe, secure, hacked should be removed, but generically categorizing and removing without context just hurts the end redditor. If the algorithm for a widely used 2FA was hacked tomorrow, I'd want to know about it because it affects privacy directly and even if you roll your own, you're no longer as private as you thought you were. I'll adhere to the sub rules obviously, but just my two cents on why just generically saying safe, secure, hacked shouldn't mean it's not about privacy.