Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G My knee jerk reaction is NO!! But then i think of what teachers colleges are put… ytc_UgyxE8fWk… G @apriljean8614 so why are you fithing against? If you are enjoying good, do it b… ytr_UgwydAGJV… G Tell me why I saw an AI artist ask someone on Pinterest to “credit there reuploa… ytc_Ugx7hADGx… G But continues to develop a chip to go inside the human brain to connect us to AI… ytc_Ugyxs9TYx… G The BBC’s anti-AI stance is not neutral caution. It’s a form of status preservat… ytc_Ugz00Q9nG… G They are telling us what’s going to happen - are we listening? When a robot has … ytc_Ugy1WHPSJ… G as a beginner artist who wants to share my art at some point, i rethink wether i… ytr_Ugxmi3Cpa… G My answer to all of the comments asking to define conciousness is this: Consciou… ytc_Ugy61TBCq…
Comment
As someone who understands training data, surely you realize just how much of said data would have to be verbatim OpenAI canned responses in order to [repeatedly and reliably generate output like this](https://twitter.com/JaxWinterbourne/status/1733364034219454636) in a foundational LLM model, right?
reddit AI Harm Incident 1702169791.0 ♥ 2
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitynone
Reasoningunclear
Policyunclear
Emotionindifference
Coded at2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"rdc_kcq75de","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"rdc_kcnu4gn","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"rdc_kcpjhfb","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"rdc_kcnbiab","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"rdc_kco4d98","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"} ]