Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Comment
I wonder what would happen if Eg. Disney built their own AI, trained it only on their own IP/Copyright material, and used it to help create art for a new movie or show? Or go one step further, say they create a new character, and commission 100 pieces of art to be used solely to train the AI to continue to produce art of the new character? They own the art, and therefor the training data, they created the AI, they trained it, and they own the IP for the character - logically it seems difficult to argue that they shouldn't be able to copyright the output. I'm of course glad that copyright rulings are protecting us like this, but I do wonder where the idea that "copyright is only for human works" might fall short.
reddit AI Governance 1692452772.0 ♥ 31
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitycompany
Reasoningdeontological
Policynone
Emotionindifference
Coded at2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"rdc_jwyxxwo","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},{"id":"rdc_jwvej8f","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},{"id":"rdc_jwuwcbp","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},{"id":"rdc_jwuworh","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},{"id":"rdc_jwvc6wx","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}]