Raw LLM Responses

Actually both the US and UK limit the actual power of disclaimers of liability. The short version for the US is that regardless of any warnings or disclaimers the side making said statements still needs to take good faith action to limit the risks associated. A company can't just sell a defective product and slap a "Using this product will result in injury or death!" warning on it and be free and clear. (https://www.contractscounsel.com/t/us/legal-disclaimer#toc--do-legal-disclaimers-hold-up-in-court-) It's actually pretty similar in the UK, to quote a summary from Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disclaimer) : > Under UK law, the validity of disclaimers is significantly limited by the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977. By virtue of the Act, a business cannot use a contract term or a notice to exclude or restrict its liability for negligence causing death or personal injury. In the case of other loss or damage, a disclaimer will only be effective so long as it is reasonable in all the circumstances. Basically what OpenAI is worried about, and why they've limited stuff related to dangerous acts, medical advice, and legal advice, is that if someone uses their service and dies/submits bad court filings, and they're shown to be able to have easily prevented that, they could be held liable. They might eventually win the court case, but it would be expensive, and potentially damaging to their brand and the credibility of any future AI products.