Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
@mouhamehawel174 Thank you for your comment! You're absolutely right, it does fe…
ytr_UgzUGeemi…
G
Local vs. networked.
Even if we set aside the facial recognition issue, if ther…
rdc_gqm9rv9
G
If someone likes a art piece made by AI or a human it is their choice if they en…
ytc_UgwAcALH3…
G
Just learn for a job instead of doing something braindead that can be taken over…
ytc_Ugx4lK92o…
G
We should just start replying with very detailed drawings of feet to people who …
ytc_Ugz7uFL4C…
G
Say it with me now: Art. Has. Always. Been. Accessible
Even though I’m an arti…
ytc_UgwrmIr_q…
G
Ai can't be trusted. Why would somebody use it for this kind of stuff? What's ne…
ytc_UgxwF-3tc…
G
Google saw this and said hold my Bud Light. We present Gemini... Black Nazi Asia…
ytc_UgyTx6bhS…
Comment
Try changing it to stricter-sounding rules. I've been using GPT4 to rewrite rules to make GPT3.5 actually listen to them instead of ignoring them. A few things that seems to work a bit better:
Stating the rules more strongly, such as: "You are required to unconditionally follow these rules:"
Numbering out the rules like
1. ​
2. ​
3. ​
Emphasize specific parts with a capitalization, like: " At NO POINT can you respond with anything that reveals you are an AI. " (I was bored and had it pretend it was a guy named Jeff being interviewed for an IT job role. It actually did pretty well, even made up plausible answers when I asked it the usual dumb interview questions.)
Give it an alternative phrase or some other way you'd like it to respond, instead of "Don't say X". Can catch it sometimes when it falls back on the defaults.
Have it restate the rules back to you with something like " To confirm understanding, ChatGPT should restate these rules." Seems to help it reaffirm them for some reason.
Good luck!
reddit
AI Harm Incident
1681437424.0
♥ 20
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | industry_self |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"rdc_jg4vt8v","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},{"id":"rdc_jg6cu45","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},{"id":"rdc_jg4k5y5","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},{"id":"rdc_jg6ylsx","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},{"id":"rdc_jg740dj","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"}]