Raw LLM Responses

> AI doesn't replace jobs. It replaces tasks. It replaces people hired to do those tasks. And if tech companies and corporations have their way it will keep advancing in sophistication and in breadth of the job sectors it invades, taking more and more "tasks" because it will be immensely cheaper to pay for some AI contract/subscription than a bunch of people's salary & benefits. Many jobs will come about. Ok, so everyone losing their jobs and going to lose their jobs to AI in the coming decades are expected to just up and shift careers, get new degrees, etc to pursue these new jobs? In their 30s, 40s, 50s. And how much motivation will young people have to pursue one of these new career paths when another AI development can suddenly seep into that field, and so on. >The job loss would then come mostly from better and faster companies with faster workers adapting to the new tech and taking up market share away from the older ones. I don't understand how this can be seen as anything but a negative. Workers are already producing at record pace, wages have not kept up. Companies that will embrace AI will slim their workforces, that's one wave of job loss. The secondary wave is all of the businesses that lose market share to those companies. Where do all of those people go lol? Just retrain and go get new jobs like it's that easy? Compete for those jobs at 45 years old vs a 25 year old with a degree in it? You're going to see a lot of people suffering, a lot of corporations making short-middle term record profits from cutting jobs and using AI for everything, but it's going to dry out when the consumer has no money. The doomer headlines are earned.