Raw LLM Responses

I believe we miss-understand AI based on the fears of what movie producer and directors were scared about decades ago. It will never be a evil machine that decides by themselves what they want to do. The biggest problem with AI's is that it will learn patterns from failed humans. Racism, sexism and many other discrimination patterns will end up in the machine, which will be more powerful in the hands of powerful people rasing the power discrepancy. In reality we need the AIs to grow a different core than the humans one, but will the people responsible want that? Yesterday there was a post on r/showerthoughts saying: "The reason we are afraid of sentient AI destroying us, is because deep down, we know we are the problem". Actually, we think that other humans are the problem and, as we can see, we have been trying to destroy those different than us since the beginning of intelligent life. We have to aim to a AI that is different than us on our prejudices. So I think the questions should be: Are we able to accept if it were to be less discriminatory than us? How will humans use it on their discriminatory wars (figuratively and literally)? Will we use it to destroy each other, as we are scared that another nation will have a more powerful AI? One away or another, AI's will always answer to human inputs. Bits and bytes are not able to being good or evil, humans are, and that's what should really concern us.