Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I’ll be honest that’s not a good argument. An actual good argument is that human…
ytc_UgygO6gmB…
G
Lol "not safe"? You got the elites turning people into "jerky" and AI is "unsafe…
ytc_Ugx0xzOok…
G
hardly 1 to 1.5 billion dollors over 5 years are nothing compare to what us and …
ytc_Ugz3fJKmR…
G
I want to see cell phones be able to get a signal no matter where you're at befo…
ytc_UgzF7pJwJ…
G
OMG, I love you're voice, I haven't seen you in forever, and when I watch this I…
ytc_UgyaYacpR…
G
I bet that the AI will turn you in if you ask something even remotely close to W…
rdc_jfwww8a
G
Lol who cares if it’s AI generated. A robot can do better than 98% of the blue h…
ytc_UgxO8zBjG…
G
LOL I like how even this fictional AI product has an anus for a logo…
rdc_modam2f
Comment
If you have a false negative rate of 0% and a false positive rate of 0.01% (99.9% accurate) then you seem like you have a very good algorithm.
The problem is that applying this to a VERY large pool that is known to be filled with people without whatever trait you are looking for is that 0.01% of that pool is a LOT of people. If you're looking across the entire US population for a single person that committed a crime this will return:
True Positives: 1 \* 100% = 1 person
False Positives: 331,449,280 \* 0.1% = 331,449 people
​
So now your criminal is actually only 0.0003% of your "guilty" pool.
reddit
AI Harm Incident
1626260612.0
♥ 30
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | developer |
| Reasoning | utilitarian |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"rdc_h5415fw","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"rdc_h54t138","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_h5429ez","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_h54hw5v","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"rdc_h553r3q","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"}
]