Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I think, this problem becomes much easier if we speak not of humans, but of pers…
ytc_UgycfRkO7…
G
That's an interesting perspective! Sophia raises a valid point about the balance…
ytr_UgzAacA1q…
G
We're not ready for A.I. The concept is too early for us.
We should at least wa…
ytc_Ugxz2Tcr9…
G
You need it on an international scale to work though. Otherwise, whichever count…
ytr_UgxPxzApN…
G
AI is not magic …it’s only as good as the data it trains on. We are far from one…
ytc_UgyBYWyp0…
G
even if you use "AI" occasionally and only for "perfect AI tasks" - you still lo…
ytc_UgwUifwvw…
G
Next gen AI is already being trained with current gen AI.
That’s the easiest wa…
rdc_l9vtcgl
G
And Pandora's box has been opened. The 'singularity' will morph into an electron…
ytc_Ugyyw77kb…
Comment
If you have a false negative rate of 0% and a false positive rate of 0.01% (99.9% accurate) then you seem like you have a very good algorithm.
The problem is that applying this to a VERY large pool that is known to be filled with people without whatever trait you are looking for is that 0.01% of that pool is a LOT of people. If you're looking across the entire US population for a single person that committed a crime this will return:
True Positives: 1 \* 100% = 1 person
False Positives: 331,449,280 \* 0.1% = 331,449 people
​
So now your criminal is actually only 0.0003% of your "guilty" pool.
reddit
AI Harm Incident
1626260612.0
♥ 30
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | developer |
| Reasoning | utilitarian |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"rdc_h5415fw","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"rdc_h54t138","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_h5429ez","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_h54hw5v","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"rdc_h553r3q","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"}
]