Raw LLM Responses

Here’s an ethical dilemma for you: What do you do if the wrongful conviction was a result of artificial intelligence? You can’t just charge the AI technology for incompetence. Do we charge the the developers who created it? Charge the police force for not looking more in-depth into (what we now know to be) the AI’s false positive? In a perfect world AI recognition software would not be involved police in work like this, but you know how police love their ‘nifty’ and unnecessary tools… They wave the fact an AI identified the individual in court and the judge and/or jury will eat that shit up with little to no second guessing. Just throwing this thought experiment out there for the sake of it. Potential recourse for wrongdoing can easily get blurred when AI technology is involved - everyone can just point their fingers elsewhere and say it wasn’t their fault… which I find more crazy than anything else being brought up in here. Us citizens need to move more towards focusing out complaints & criticisms - opposed to making broad and general remarks. In this case we need to focus on advocating for the removal of AI facial recognition tools for police forces. That should be step number one. The ethical dilemma for who gets in trouble (while interesting to think about) will get us absolutely nowhere, and we’ll just find ourselves reading an article identical this in the next few months. Food for thought. Edit: to those who disagree… Im literally advocating for the same thing as the wrongfully convicted… > Michigan resident Robert Williams testified about being wrongfully arrested by Detroit Police in an **effort to urge Congress to pass legislation against the use of facial recognition technology.** If this legislation passes. He’ll be able to sue the city of Detroit successfully and with ease. If that legislation does not pass, then it’ll be an uphill battle for there. AI tech has proven notoriously bad at matching/recognizing POC faces by the way… Why