Raw LLM Responses

The two big ones are the assault weapon ban and magazine capacity. First off "assault weapon" is a very broad term and essentially boils down to a scary looking semi auto rifle. Basically ALL guns today are semi auto, so he is essentially saying he wants a federal ban on all semi automatic rifles. Alot of the things they use to describe an assault weapon are things that don't actually make a gun more dangerous, like an adjustable butt stock or forward grip etc. Both of those things just make them more accurate to shoot and more comfortable for the user, which means SAFER and less prone to accidental diacharges. Also guns like AR15s and AKs are demonized when in reality rifles of ANY kind only make up about 2 percent of gun crime, they are literally the safest gun type you can own statistically speaking. You are more likely to be stabbed or beaten to death than to be shot with a rifle. So why is there such a push to ban them? It's all fear mongering. As far as magazine capacity there are alot of reasons to have multiple rounds. If you are using a gun for self defense you don't KNOW how many rounds you are going to need to stop a threat, it's not like the movies where you shoot somebody once and they drop, you might have to hit them 3 or 4 times, now throw in multiple attacker's, now take into account tunnel vision leading to loss of accuracy, now say it's 3am in a dark house. Those extra rounds make a difference. There are alot of other stupid laws in general that he supports, like the fact that suppressor's being extremely hard to get and require a special tax stamp and a bunch of forms from the ATF. it's all based on myths perpetuated by Hollywood movies. A high end suppressor on a 9mm is still going to be about 130Db which is the equivalent of a jet engine at 50ft. It's LOUD. but the difference is enough to make shooting safer for the individual in the long run. It's only banned because some politicians with literally ZERO understanding of guns decided they k