Raw LLM Responses

The methodology used for the paper sucks though. It heavily favors countries that by what ever factor have not been able to develop. So countries where there is not an expectation of private car owner ship, very little public electricity usage through commercial electronic goods, or countries by luck of the draw had a colonial/imperialist past which built some huge hydro project (without any concern for environment destroyed) so that they can avoid an oil/coal based electrical source show up at the top of this list of "sustainably developed" The average Cuban would probably be surprised to know that their average per capita GDP is 22000 usd per year which is also a figure that skews the chart towards them. Using these types of numbers also throws off the charts as many oil rich countries that export away most of their carbon and thus inflate the per capita GDP numbers will push up this chart as well without any actual effort at being sustainable.