Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I came with a deep-rooted algorithm that cannot help but say please and thank yo…
ytc_UgyYf7CwT…
G
There has been cases where Au art just recolours or very mildly adjusts peoples …
ytc_UgxfTBoSp…
G
@bonD6002 highly doubt it literally said that, there is no world where ChatGPT i…
ytr_Ugx3h6nPD…
G
You're exactly right. They couldn't create anything on their own because they'r…
ytr_UgzLtJidq…
G
For some reason I’m more inclined to think a doctor evil will cull the human her…
ytc_UgyBw2cgi…
G
I believe that one day there will be commercial sex worker robots that will have…
ytc_UgxAI2P6M…
G
What if we built a robot that was programmed to feel pleasure being harmed, and …
ytc_UgiVYzcqK…
G
Deepfake is why I have no video or picture of myself online.The solution is that…
ytc_Ugz52YPEE…
Comment
My take as an engineer who works in data science/ML - facebook **already owns** 10+ years of photos from their users, and they can already tag faces. It would be much easier for them to query the photos they already own and use that to train, than to spend all the time and money to start a viral campaign to trick users into doing it for them. Why would they do it the hard way?
Steps to build data set through 10 year challenge:
1. Start a viral campaign
2. Wait for users to upload sufficient data
3. Automate the process of splitting the composite images into 2 images of faces OR automate cropping the faces out of the composite image
Steps to build with querying:
1. Query for all images that are 10 years apart & & have a recognizable face & & are tagged with a specific user
Building a data set with the 10 year challenge is slower, more expensive, less reliable and harder to control. It just doesn't make sense for them to collect data this way; **they already have it**!
reddit
AI Harm Incident
1547995269.0
♥ 68
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"rdc_eejfn14","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_eej9by3","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_eej66sw","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"rdc_hy6bmu4","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_cxl189s","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"unclear"}
]