Raw LLM Responses

> And against a Kantian morality grounded in the concepts of autonomy, reason, and duty, Nietzsche pours scorn on such a construction and suggests that Kant is a mere sophist that is not to be taken seriously. Do you think that Kant was aware of this? As in, it seems plausible to read Spinoza as pushing the limits of geometrical reason to its absurd limits. Thus, as Adorno points out in "Against Epistemology" it seems reasonable to assume that Kant knew better than to think that there could ever be anyone (let alone an entire populace) who operated within the bounds of the transcendental idealism subject he puts forth. Or, how might we understand the criticism of transcendental subjectivity in light of neoliberal propositions of rational autonomy when no one really believes that we are completely autonomous and rational?