Raw LLM Responses

I think that response to PoE should satisfy you. When we say that we are ignorant of the true purposes of an ostensibly immoral act, we are not saying that what we perceive as evil actions are really justified. Rather, actions can violate our human conception of morality without violating a theoretical God's 'ultimate' morality. The PoE fails because it equates what we humans believe is good and evil independent of a God (i.e. our subjective moral compasses) with the presumed perfection of God's morality, which operates from a perspective of omniscience which we can never attain. Now, this still leaves the burden of proof on the theist to show that a) God exists, and 2) these two versions of morality, the human and the divine are coherent concepts that make sense in conjunction. But these issues are different from the PoE.