TU-HEALTH Health chapter (AI Scribe)

Feeds the Health domain chapter thesis-use

Co-occurs with
VC-PREF ×1 RL-EPISTEMIC ×1

Node view — 3 coded passages across the corpus

Moral disagreement and the limits of AI value alignment: a dual challenge of epistemic ju… · Nick Schuster; Daniel Kilov · 2025

“One notable limitation of MedEthEx, however, is that it requires a definitive response for each training case, and so it cannot learn from two trainers who disagree with each other. [...] But medical ethicists can and do disagree with each other, not just about specific cases but general principles too, and even overarching ethical frameworks (MedEthEx's four duties are themselves contestable).”
why coded: MedEthEx: medical-ethics expert disagreement; Beauchamp & Childress duties contestable · unit #7, pp. 6076

Responsibility Attribution for AI-Mediated Damages with Mechanistic Interpretability · Lena Kästner; Johann Cordes; Herbert Zech · 2026

“This suggestion relates to worries about humans in the loop becoming scapegoats [40]: When deployers work with black box AI systems they do not understand, and just (blindly) confirm or follow AI recommendations, they run the risk of becoming mere scapegoats for AI-mediated damages; they are held responsible although they do not have any understanding or control over the damages incurred. With our analysis in mind, scapegoating can be avoided: for if the deployer utilizes an opaque AI system in the ways it is intended to be used, they are not responsible for potential damages [...]; if, by contrast, the system is rendered interpretable, they might be responsible but no longer unknowingly so.”
why coded: Scapegoat-in-the-loop citation (Ranisch) is medical-AI - direct AI Scribe material · unit #8, pp. 195

Beyond Preference-based Value-alignment (IEAI Research Brief Q2 2026) · Julia Li · 2026

“AI used in healthcare settings may need to abide by not just individual hospital standards, but the ethical norms in the healthcare profession in which AI is being used. Nurses may be trained to focus on holistic care and patient advocacy, while physicians could focus more on accurate diagnosis and treatment. However, both professions operate according to bioethical principles such as autonomy, justice, beneficence and non-maleficence (Beauchamp & Childress, 1979). These differences may not be clear if the two groups are aggregated and, therefore, result in misalignment.”
why coded: Healthcare professional norms vs aggregated preferences - direct AI Scribe framing · unit #4, pp. 3