Raw LLM Responses

Matthew P. Your point about AI governance running in reverse is well made. Thank you for clarifying. I would push back on the idea that the potential catastrophic downside risk inherent to AI was well understood prior to its use at-scale (by DARPA, The Pentagon, Science Fiction writers, Hollywood, etc). However, enough decision makers (public and private) were sold on the following: 1) massive upside of digital assistants (productivity, prosperity, innovation) 2) long time-horizon on generative ai, wide-spread adoption, and digital sentience and so here we are. I hope that boards will act on that signal, but am not yet optimistic. A lot of big egos are going to have to walk back pet projects and big promises to Constituents, Congress, and Wall Street, and sadly, that seems unlikely to be a swift process absent tight regulation - which, will almost certainly be viewed as reactionary and overly-restrictive.