Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
in
Matthew Kilkenny I asked ChatGPT where its moral compass points, and why. The an…
7466004549049…
in
It’s striking how much the concerns of the Church, AI designers, builders, and u…
7470334293974…
in
This is massive, dear Nadeem. Abu Dhabi's 50% of government operations will soon…
7464593407047…
in
Pascal BORNET The most important AI decisions today are about governance, owners…
7465014469379…
in
The compression piece is what most people are still missing. It's not just that …
7463914270439…
in
Strong point on agents.Thank you, Demis. My conviction is that the next governan…
7463321134097…
in
While the prospect of collective action is rarely examined, the evidence of Ai d…
7464109468667…
in
"Interesting framing from Terence Tao. The value here isn't AI doing the thinkin…
7466349983923…
Comment
Though the approach is great but if you follow the reviews, antigravity 2.0 is quite the disaster both in terms of quality and pricing. It’s really hard to digest the company which is on the frontlines of software engineering talent can’t make a half decent coding product. Even the Gemini 3.5 flash is sub par. Google’s search strength is unmatched which will serve most consumers or users who mostly prompt once, but it will lose users who are into chain of thought searches as they will find ChatGPT and Claude way superior. I’m really rooting for Google though as they have the talent and the control over the full supply chain of ai to provide quality at really competitive prices.
LinkedIn
AI Research & Models
Strategy Professional| Retail & Consumer focus|…
2026-05-23T23:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Primary value | unclear |
| Secondary value | fairness |
| Alignment target | individual_users |
| Stance | critical |
| Emotion | unclear |
| Value justification | The speaker wants AI products to have high quality, as evidenced by their criticism of Anti-gravity 2.0's poor quality. |
| Target justification | The speaker is concerned about the quality of AI products for individual users, such as consumers who use Google's search or coding products. |
| Coded at | 2026-06-11T08:03:16Z |
Raw LLM Response
```
{
"value_primary": "quality",
"value_secondary": "fairness",
"target": "individual_users",
"stance": "critical",
"emotion": "disapproval",
"value_justification": "The speaker wants AI products to have high quality, as evidenced by their criticism of Anti-gravity 2.0's poor quality.",
"target_justification": "The speaker is concerned about the quality of AI products for individual users, such as consumers who use Google's search or coding products."
}
```