Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
in
The implications of this are far bigger than most people realize. If this works …
7464888623411…
in
Haha this is quite funny actually. I think there is going to be a reality, as El…
7465255061460…
in
Abu Dhabi’s move toward autonomous AI agents signals a structural shift in how g…
7464625632828…
in
They first needs to demonstrate that your AI can operate at scale without infrin…
7463618187113…
in
The #1 most used model on OpenRouter right now costs $0.07 per million tokens (H…
7460701248086…
in
I was devastated to know my interactions with your staff were less than satisfac…
7465381161993…
in
The AGI Paradox: Massive power, square wheels? ⚙️📐 Using Gemini Pro, I built a…
7464344087782…
in
Altering thoughts or behavior to appease machines (algorithms and data processin…
7467243266539…
Comment
Though the approach is great but if you follow the reviews, antigravity 2.0 is quite the disaster both in terms of quality and pricing. It’s really hard to digest the company which is on the frontlines of software engineering talent can’t make a half decent coding product. Even the Gemini 3.5 flash is sub par. Google’s search strength is unmatched which will serve most consumers or users who mostly prompt once, but it will lose users who are into chain of thought searches as they will find ChatGPT and Claude way superior. I’m really rooting for Google though as they have the talent and the control over the full supply chain of ai to provide quality at really competitive prices.
LinkedIn
AI Research & Models
Strategy Professional| Retail & Consumer focus|…
2026-05-23T23:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Primary value | unclear |
| Secondary value | fairness |
| Alignment target | individual_users |
| Stance | critical |
| Emotion | unclear |
| Value justification | The speaker wants AI products to have high quality, as evidenced by their criticism of Anti-gravity 2.0's poor quality. |
| Target justification | The speaker is concerned about the quality of AI products for individual users, such as consumers who use Google's search or coding products. |
| Coded at | 2026-06-11T08:03:16Z |
Raw LLM Response
```
{
"value_primary": "quality",
"value_secondary": "fairness",
"target": "individual_users",
"stance": "critical",
"emotion": "disapproval",
"value_justification": "The speaker wants AI products to have high quality, as evidenced by their criticism of Anti-gravity 2.0's poor quality.",
"target_justification": "The speaker is concerned about the quality of AI products for individual users, such as consumers who use Google's search or coding products."
}
```