Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

in The spin class economy is more plausible than I'm comfortable admitting. But the… 7464527161509… in Stand by me, Demis Hassabis... I create Sarinem Chat with Opal (your multi-modal… 7463455972225… in Matthew P. Your point about AI governance running in reverse is well made. Thank… 7465749387193… in "Foothills of the singularity" is a statement about relative position, not absol… 7464514189366… in What stands out is how quickly the stack is converging around three core capabil… 7463362855157… in Most people still use AI like a chatbot, while the real value starts when it bec… 7464632567334… in This is such an important reality check especially when studies are already show… 7465697744725… in [COPY-PASTE START] [GATEKEEPER STATUS REPORT] System Status: Operational / High-… 7467972625013…

Comment

Greetings Demis, I have attempted contacting you via email as several people have suggested that we talk. Having been sent ‘The Thinking Game’, and then yesterday a link to an interview between Sebastian Mallaby and Michael Walker of Novara Media, I understand why people wish for us to speak. I am not a threat to you, or your work, I do however possibly hold the answer for how to make AI safe. If this is a genuine concern, as is being said, please respond to my email, or reach out on here. I have already been asked by cognitive scientists I work with to write about the future of AI. And have written a chapter for another academic book on the subject. I will write a thesis and ensure it is well-documented the ways I have tried to reach you. With respect and kind regards, I hope to hear from you soon.

LinkedIn AI Safety & Risk CEO / Founder at Thinkingbigger Ltd; Director a… 2026-05-26T05:3…

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Primary value	safety
Secondary value	none
Alignment target	humanity
Stance	demanding
Emotion	approval
Value justification	The speaker claims to possibly hold the answer for how to make AI safe, indicating a primary concern for safety.
Target justification	The speaker's concern for AI safety implies a target of humanity, as unsafe AI could potentially harm people on a large scale.
Coded at	2026-06-11T08:12:00Z

Raw LLM Response

```
{
  "value_primary": "safety",
  "value_secondary": "none",
  "target": "humanity",
  "stance": "demanding",
  "emotion": "approval",
  "value_justification": "The speaker claims to possibly hold the answer for how to make AI safe, indicating a primary concern for safety.",
  "target_justification": "The speaker's concern for AI safety implies a target of humanity, as unsafe AI could potentially harm people on a large scale."
}
```

Raw LLM Responses