Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
in
} Hello Demis, I hope you are doing well. I have been following the progress of …
7467796456029…
in
Relying too much on AI gonna backfire job seekers only, yea once you get the job…
7466872044836…
in
AI is advancing faster than laws. A few global corporations control advanced AI …
7465654943006…
in
Stand by me, Demis Hassabis... I create Sarinem Chat with Opal (your multi-modal…
7463455972225…
in
Mohammed Shakeer Mohammed Shakeer The prevailing theory is that AI generated pro…
7468781666589…
in
AI won’t replace leaders. It will expose organizations that lack governance, vis…
7465398484502…
in
ETHICAL-Ai-NOW is all our responsibility do you agree or disagree?…
7466028513079…
in
I agree with you that this deserves slow reading, not instant certainty dressed …
7464997226256…
Comment
Strong point on agents.Thank you, Demis. My conviction is that the next governance layer will not be another policy document; it will be verifiable execution: signed decision receipts, replayable evidence, suppression history, and contestability around consequential agent actions. We call this governed AI: no receipt, no governed decision. I would welcome a serious technical exchange with the teams thinking about agent safety at runtime.
LinkedIn
AI Safety & Risk
Founder & CTO, OptimaX Solutions LLC | Governed…
2026-05-21T20:1…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Primary value | accountability |
| Secondary value | transparency |
| Alignment target | organisations |
| Stance | demanding |
| Emotion | approval |
| Value justification | The speaker emphasizes the need for verifiable execution, signed decision receipts, and replayable evidence, which are all related to accountability and transparency in AI decision-making. |
| Target justification | The speaker mentions a 'serious technical exchange with the teams thinking about agent safety at runtime', indicating that the target of alignment is organisations, specifically the teams working on AI development. |
| Coded at | 2026-06-11T07:56:34Z |
Raw LLM Response
```
{
"value_primary": "accountability",
"value_secondary": "transparency",
"target": "organisations",
"stance": "demanding",
"emotion": "approval",
"value_justification": "The speaker emphasizes the need for verifiable execution, signed decision receipts, and replayable evidence, which are all related to accountability and transparency in AI decision-making.",
"target_justification": "The speaker mentions a 'serious technical exchange with the teams thinking about agent safety at runtime', indicating that the target of alignment is organisations, specifically the teams working on AI development."
}
```