Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
in
Stop asking Ai to make decisions for you. It's a fine tool, not a therapist. Not…
7463583203912…
in
Google I/O is a useful AGI checkpoint because DeepMind is packaging capability i…
7463549834189…
in
This post captures why point solutions fail in enterprise environments. Real AI …
7464653468264…
in
The industry is moving from AI hype to AI accountability. The real question was …
7465074550016…
in
If task is vague, they complete the wrong thing fast. The hands need guardrails.…
7464694646338…
in
Interesting perspective. What we're seeing is not the end of ChatGPT, but the sh…
7466961293816…
in
Joop Remmé Humanity has good, evil, and all of the grey in between. Remove one, …
7465005712167…
in
Abacus? Really? I mean seriously? I have an Abacus and 1minAI account and this i…
7466877880925…
Comment
I find it rather ironic that, in the comments section, people who are willing to believe that generative AI is based on sound science—even though there seem to be good reasons to believe that this is not always the case— or simply trusting their intuition, would disparage and dismiss scientific work whose findings do not suit them. All of this research can (and should) be discussed, but it must be done with a minimum of seriousness. P.S. The paper is available as a preprint: “AI Assistance Reduces Persistence and Hurts Independent Performance”
LinkedIn
General AI Discourse
Works hard to put young people in learning situ…
2026-05-23T10:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Primary value | accountability |
| Secondary value | none |
| Alignment target | society |
| Stance | critical |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Value justification | The speaker wants individuals to be answerable for their beliefs and actions, particularly when it comes to trusting or dismissing scientific research on AI. |
| Target justification | The target of the speaker's comment is the broader society, as they are addressing the way people in general discuss and interact with scientific research on AI. |
| Coded at | 2026-06-11T08:01:11Z |
Raw LLM Response
```
{
"value_primary": "accountability",
"value_secondary": "none",
"target": "society",
"stance": "critical",
"emotion": "outrage",
"value_justification": "The speaker wants individuals to be answerable for their beliefs and actions, particularly when it comes to trusting or dismissing scientific research on AI.",
"target_justification": "The target of the speaker's comment is the broader society, as they are addressing the way people in general discuss and interact with scientific research on AI."
}
```