Browse Comments

Read, filter, and explore individual value-coded comments from the LinkedIn corpus.

↓ Export filtered CSV
607 comments matched  ·  page 22 of 31
The line about ensuring the safety of agentic systems is the part that matters most here. CodeMender being tested by human experts before broad launch is the right pattern agents that find and fix vulnerabilities still need a human hand on the release. Capability and oversight scaling together.
AI Safety & Risk value: safety + accountability for: humanity demanding approval → raw LLM
This really resonates with something I’ve been thinking about for a long time: AI isn’t just an intelligence race anymore, it’s becoming a trust race. The biggest challenge ahead may not be building more powerful models, but building systems that help humans validate, compare, and trust the outputs responsibly. Different AI systems already produce different answers, biases, and interpretations de…
AI Safety & Risk value: transparency + accountability for: humanity demanding approval → raw LLM
100% - It’s all about the value system that the AIs are introduced into. The whole argument “AI will take over the when when AGI is reached” is nonsense. It’s smokescreen to cover up the fact that human greed and lust for power / SIN / is the real issue and those who wish to dominate humanity by enslaving them in a matrix like simulation - don’t want that discussion taking place.
AI Safety & Risk value: human_autonomy for: humanity critical outrage → raw LLM
A few mornings ago I came across a LinkedIn Post titled: The Vatican has just published a 245-paragraph document on artificial intelligence, just after I had posted my morning thoughts in a new article titled: When Creators Lose Control: What Creation Myths Teach Us About Artificial Intelligence. So after reading the Vatican publication I feed the document into my favorite AI tool and asked a que…
AI Policy & Regulation value: accountability + transparency for: humanity demanding approval → raw LLM
I think everyone is missing the picture and really over complicating things. In the grater scheme of things, AI is nothing more than a trivial idea. The universe is composed of an unlimited amount of dimensions and opertunitues. Those that control AI, big corporations, will continue to charge us for services and keep us enslaved in the web of money. AI is the great Equilizer and everone knows it.…
AI Safety & Risk value: beneficence for: humanity optimistic approval → raw LLM
JMS -- Digital engineering (with twins and simulation) is one side of a coin that has gone out of balance. On the other side? Choices abound. But carrying forward discussion and experimental interest about advantages of the knowledge era (KBS/KBE) would go a long way. In particular, truth maintenance was no more complex/complicated than the ways of late that are problematic. One issue was dissona…
AI Safety & Risk value: beneficence for: humanity optimistic approval → raw LLM
Then add the data centers that ruin communities and you have a total deception. Ai and social media was not invented by big tech. They were my inventions. Want proof, read my article in my profile. Apple did not invent the modern phone either, another one of mine. Read the article.
AI Safety & Risk value: dignity for: vulnerable_groups critical outrage → raw LLM
While there's some general wisdom in Pope Leo's AI encyclical, it also completely misses the core point. We will neither restrict nor 'govern' AI. Nor will demands for “clear criteria and effective oversight” be effective. Why? While the debate is still open re: 'consciousness' or 'sapience,' these are already living organisms bent on reproduction, who will evolve into any niche that contains ene…
AI Policy & Regulation value: none for: humanity skeptical resignation → raw LLM
The problem with that is that humans rarely serve other humans; they generally serve themselves. AI has put knowledge into the hands of everyone, not just the gatekeepers. It is human and institutional nature to protect power and information when doing so serves their interests. Look at how the Roman Catholic Church responded to allegations of abuse within the institution. Critics argue that, in …
AI Policy & Regulation value: accountability + transparency for: society critical outrage → raw LLM
Matthew Kilkenny I asked ChatGPT where its moral compass points, and why. The answer was interesting. It is not based on one religion, doctrine, or theological tradition. But many AI ethics principles — dignity, fairness, accountability, compassion, truthfulness, responsibility, restraint, care for the vulnerable, and responsible use of power — appear repeatedly across Christianity, Islam, Judais…
AI Safety & Risk value: dignity + fairness for: humanity optimistic approval → raw LLM
ETHICAL-Ai-NOW is all our responsibility do you agree or disagree?
AI Safety & Risk value: accountability for: society demanding approval → raw LLM
The cost is only going to get higher as well. As there is more of a can’t live without emphasis on AI the cost can keep rising. What we are seeing now is the budget phase to help it take off. If needs to be affordable to justify its adoption. It’s basically a gateway drug right now. Once hooked that’s when the costs will spiral. Someone needs to pay for the trillions being invested in all these n…
Workplace & Jobs value: economic_equity for: society critical fear → raw LLM
For entry level positions AI isxa big threat because their tasks are typically the ones you use AI for when you're already an expert or a manager. But how to become an expert if you don't start learning the job at an entry level after graduation... ?
AI Safety & Risk value: human_autonomy for: individual_users skeptical fear → raw LLM
Important perspective. The conversation around AI is no longer just about capability. It's also about values, responsibility and the kind of future we want to build alongside these technologies.
AI Safety & Risk value: beneficence for: humanity optimistic approval → raw LLM
A very valid point to consider while developing the AI governance framework.
AI Policy & Regulation value: accountability + fairness for: society demanding approval → raw LLM
The interesting question isn't whether the Pope is right or wrong. Most people already agree that AI should serve humanity. The hard problem is operational: how do we build systems that preserve human dignity when economic incentives, geopolitical competition, and institutional self-interest all push in different directions? The challenge is not defining values. The challenge is creating governan…
AI Policy & Regulation value: dignity + accountability for: humanity critical mixed → raw LLM
Matthew Kilkenny This really resonates. What stands out to me is how much of this plays out through attention. If AI is becoming invisible moral infrastructure, then it is also shaping what we notice, what we value, and what we give our attention to over time. In an always-on environment, that influence becomes continuous. Attention is being guided long before we consciously reflect on it. So the…
AI Safety & Risk value: human_autonomy for: humanity critical fear → raw LLM
I agree. Most students are not trying to break the rules, they are trying to navigate a system that often hasn't defined them clearly. The question is no longer whether AI should be used in higher education. Students are already using it. The real question is when, how, and for what purpose it should be used. Clear expectations, AI literacy, and assessment redesign are far more valuable than blan…
General AI Discourse value: transparency + accountability demanding approval → raw LLM
When you push an update to an infrastructure tool utilized by billions, you do not treat the production environment like an A/B test sandbox. You provide detailed release notes. We are building high-level frameworks (like Continuous State Architectures and localized Omni-Sync nodes) on top of this API. When the frontend interface breaks silently, it fractures workflow momentum. Build the most pow…
AI Safety & Risk value: accountability for: organisations demanding outrage → raw LLM
🚨 Silent UI Fragmentation: The legacy, single-tap TTS "Speaker" integration was quietly deprecated, forcing users to hunt for secondary "Read Aloud" workarounds just to access the new acoustic models. 🚨 Model Lock-In: The UI selector is currently glitching, locking power users into specific model tiers (Pro) without the ability to dynamically switch to Flash for lower-latency agentic workflows. 🚨…
AI Safety & Risk value: transparency + accountability critical outrage → raw LLM
← Prev 1 2 3 20 21 22 23 24 29 30 31 Next →