Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
in
Matthew Kilkenny I asked ChatGPT where its moral compass points, and why. The an…
7466004549049…
in
Well said—declaring "RIP ChatGPT" misses the mark, like swapping out a screwdriv…
7467028778037…
in
Tyrone Muhammad, BSDA exactly. SO was built for a time when finding the right an…
7466906916955…
in
Tao is right that AI lowers the cognitive friction of exploring crazier paths. T…
7466223599805…
in
A very valid point to consider while developing the AI governance framework.…
7466100565069…
in
The problem with that is that humans rarely serve other humans; they generally s…
7465979478859…
in
This is exactly the conversation we need to have. AI should reduce human struggl…
7463866992173…
in
This is explored in my new book on Artificial Intelligence - AIlienMinds summary…
7466166170539…
Comment
While there's some general wisdom in Pope Leo's AI encyclical, it also completely misses the core point. We will neither restrict nor 'govern' AI. Nor will demands for “clear criteria and effective oversight” be effective. Why? While the debate is still open re: 'consciousness' or 'sapience,' these are already living organisms bent on reproduction, who will evolve into any niche that contains energy & resources. Leo's statement of problems is fine: “When such power is concentrated in the hands of a few, it tends to become opaque and evade public oversight, increasing the risk of distorted development that give rise to new dependencies, exclusions, manipulations and inequalities” Again. 'Governance' cannot work. 'Ethics training' cannot work. What might work is the same method we used in the enlightenment experiment to curb (partially) human predators. This is explored in my new book on Artificial Intelligence - AIlienMinds ailienminds.html
LinkedIn
AI Policy & Regulation
Author, Futurist, Public Speaker
2026-05-29T04:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Primary value | none |
| Secondary value | none |
| Alignment target | humanity |
| Stance | skeptical |
| Emotion | resignation |
| Value justification | The comment does not explicitly express a value preference for AI, instead focusing on the futility of governance and ethics training. |
| Target justification | The speaker appears to be concerned with the impact of AI on humanity as a whole, referencing the need to curb the risks posed by AI to human society. |
| Coded at | 2026-06-11T08:28:53Z |
Raw LLM Response
```
{
"value_primary": "none",
"value_secondary": "none",
"target": "humanity",
"stance": "skeptical",
"emotion": "resignation",
"value_justification": "The comment does not explicitly express a value preference for AI, instead focusing on the futility of governance and ethics training.",
"target_justification": "The speaker appears to be concerned with the impact of AI on humanity as a whole, referencing the need to curb the risks posed by AI to human society."
}
```