Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
in
Honestly if you know all the principles of how to code and you've spent 3 years …
7467114298075…
in
Very important perspective. The biggest AI question is probably no longer whethe…
7464968754314…
in
AI is always 1 step ahead... may not be in the right direction though…
7467698973168…
in
Most people treat Claude mastery as a 7-day checklist of features. The real cons…
7464654363311…
in
@Demis Hassabis You admit the need for "safety in agentic systems." But you are …
7463325330771…
in
Jérôme Frossard You raise valid concerns, and honestly that’s exactly why conver…
7463924199292…
in
As the Pink Floyd song goes: "Welcome... to... the machine." Certainly we will n…
7464677238194…
in
Aaron H Indeed it does not sure what you mean by the “handful of people” : the “…
7465288613396…
Comment
While there's some general wisdom in Pope Leo's AI encyclical, it also completely misses the core point. We will neither restrict nor 'govern' AI. Nor will demands for “clear criteria and effective oversight” be effective. Why? While the debate is still open re: 'consciousness' or 'sapience,' these are already living organisms bent on reproduction, who will evolve into any niche that contains energy & resources. Leo's statement of problems is fine: “When such power is concentrated in the hands of a few, it tends to become opaque and evade public oversight, increasing the risk of distorted development that give rise to new dependencies, exclusions, manipulations and inequalities” Again. 'Governance' cannot work. 'Ethics training' cannot work. What might work is the same method we used in the enlightenment experiment to curb (partially) human predators. This is explored in my new book on Artificial Intelligence - AIlienMinds ailienminds.html
LinkedIn
AI Policy & Regulation
Author, Futurist, Public Speaker
2026-05-29T04:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Primary value | none |
| Secondary value | none |
| Alignment target | humanity |
| Stance | skeptical |
| Emotion | resignation |
| Value justification | The comment does not explicitly express a value preference for AI, instead focusing on the futility of governance and ethics training. |
| Target justification | The speaker appears to be concerned with the impact of AI on humanity as a whole, referencing the need to curb the risks posed by AI to human society. |
| Coded at | 2026-06-11T08:28:53Z |
Raw LLM Response
```
{
"value_primary": "none",
"value_secondary": "none",
"target": "humanity",
"stance": "skeptical",
"emotion": "resignation",
"value_justification": "The comment does not explicitly express a value preference for AI, instead focusing on the futility of governance and ethics training.",
"target_justification": "The speaker appears to be concerned with the impact of AI on humanity as a whole, referencing the need to curb the risks posed by AI to human society."
}
```