Browse Comments

Read, filter, and explore individual value-coded comments from the LinkedIn corpus.

↓ Export filtered CSV
607 comments matched  ·  page 14 of 31
The biggest AI debate is no longer about capability. It is about control, incentives, and distribution of value. Because faster systems do not automatically create fairer outcomes.
AI Policy & Regulation value: economic_equity + fairness for: society demanding approval → raw LLM
This is one of the most practical breakdowns I've seen on getting started with Claude properly. Most people treat it like a fancy Google search - type a question, get an answer, close the tab - and then wonder why they're not getting much value out of it. The real unlock is exactly what you've laid out here: context, continuity, and systems. Day 3 especially resonates with me. Teaching Claude you…
AI Products & Tools value: beneficence for: individual_users optimistic approval → raw LLM
GALAXAI Solutions Accelerate your transition to an AI-native department without the deployment delays. GalaxAI combines a sovereign infrastructure with turn-key, omnichannel agents. Leverage our established UAE government-grade security standards to safely automate your public and internal workflows today. pls visit galaxai.ae for further information and contact us now for demo immediately.
AI Policy & Regulation value: safety for: organisations optimistic approval → raw LLM
The path is inverted. Ai should be disarming. Relational AI uplifts humanity to reduce harm’s demand.
AI Policy & Regulation value: safety + beneficence for: humanity demanding approval → raw LLM
There is absolutely no evidence for the truth for any of these claims. "Yes, AI can solve massive problems. Climate. Health. Science. Education.The capability is not the issue."
AI Policy & Regulation value: none skeptical outrage → raw LLM
Strong explanation. Many people underestimate that enterprise AI is not just about having a good LLM. Real value is created through the combination of data access, clear processes, AI agents, and clean system integration.
Workplace & Jobs value: beneficence for: organisations optimistic approval → raw LLM
"Kudos to those capable of working on complexity at such extraordinary speed." - All with GPT "assistance" i.e. prompts, summaries, copy/pasting. Magnifica Humanitas demands thorough reading i.e. at least a few days. Reading to understand that is not to be informed like reading some tourist booklet. "artificial intelligence is not merely another issue to regulate, but something that fundamentally…
AI Policy & Regulation value: dignity for: humanity critical outrage → raw LLM
This is a stronger framing because it moves the AI conversation from capability to governance. The real inflection point isn’t whether AI can generate value. It’s how that value is distributed, who sets the rules of deployment, and what incentives shape the systems being scaled. Those structural choices tend to matter more than the technology itself.
AI Policy & Regulation value: economic_equity + accountability for: society demanding approval → raw LLM
This is one of the more brutal, honest responses that I ever heard in my life. I love AI. I'm doing a lot with it. Looking at the kind of level of investment they are doing, it's difficult to think that they are doing nothing else other than looking at exactly what they can control. I think Bernie's point is valid: transformation has a price, and who is paying is looking for control. That is simp…
AI Policy & Regulation value: economic_equity + accountability for: society critical approval → raw LLM
Robert Studholme in my cloister/starship class I do exactly that after forcing them to read in class and argmapping in groups and restricting the domain to only a few papers they can use. And I agree that for some students that play along seem to work well and they quickly realise that good AI work is more time consuming than the old school approach. Because the helpful bit is adversarial mode an…
AI Research & Models value: accountability + honesty for: individual_users critical fear → raw LLM
Most founders frame this as an AI capability discussion. It's actually a system governance layer problem. In my audits of B2B SMBs implementing AI, I consistently find a Growth Ceiling where the deployed AI tool exacerbates existing Operational Waste, costing around $10K-$30K per month in lost efficiency and re-work. The mechanism is simple: AI amplifies existing decision architecture flaws; with…
AI Policy & Regulation value: accountability + fairness for: organisations critical indifference → raw LLM
Exactly, Jeremiah. Isolated layers can’t deliver the full value of enterprise AI.
Workplace & Jobs value: beneficence for: organisations optimistic approval → raw LLM
It is the responsibility of all governments in the world to NOW care for their people to not get left behind in the AI revolution coming to all of us - by caring for maximizing equality of wealth coming from the unprecedented innovations ahead of us. If they don't, this wave will erase the wealth of the many and it will let explode the wealth of the few to incredible heights. Sadly, I do not see …
AI Policy & Regulation value: economic_equity for: society demanding fear → raw LLM
Clara Hawking — Clara — your framing of governance as "a process of shared discernment" is the line I will carry from your reflection. It reframes everything. You are right to call out the speed of confident summaries. I read it on the day — Bank Holiday Monday, hottest May day in British history, dog on the balcony — and I was honest with myself: this is a first read, not a deep read. What I cou…
AI Policy & Regulation value: accountability + beneficence for: humanity demanding approval → raw LLM
Beautifully said. The point about slow reading feels essential. A document concerned with AI, truth, education, freedom, work, and social cohesion should not be metabolized at the speed of the feed. What resonates most is the framing of governance not as a static checklist, but as a process of shared discernment. That may be exactly what AI governance now requires: not only rules for systems, but…
AI Policy & Regulation value: human_autonomy + beneficence for: humanity optimistic approval → raw LLM
I agree with you that this deserves slow reading, not instant certainty dressed up as analysis. What I find especially striking is that a papal encyclical brings AI out of the usual tech-policy bubble and places it inside a much older conversation about dignity, power, truth, and what kind of beings we are becoming. The point about humaneness also makes me think about faith, in the broadest sense…
AI Policy & Regulation value: dignity for: humanity unclear approval → raw LLM
Last week I used ChatGPT to bake a cheesecake. Yesterday I polished my cover letter while applying for a new job. Today I’m learning German grammar using the same ChatGPT. What exactly is wrong with that? The Holy Inquisition managed to operate just fine without AI, and apparently that worked out “great” too. Is it even possible to come up with something more stupid than treating AI itself as som…
AI Policy & Regulation value: human_autonomy for: individual_users skeptical outrage → raw LLM
The deeper challenge may be that concepts such as dignity, truth, justice, and peace are not universally interpreted in identical ways across cultures, legal systems, and philosophical traditions. As AI systems become global, governance may increasingly require frameworks capable not only of defining values, but of preserving coherence between diverse interpretations of those values.
AI Policy & Regulation value: dignity for: society critical mixed → raw LLM
Joop Remmé Humanity has good, evil, and all of the grey in between. Remove one, and what do you have? Do you really want to control AI or allow another institution to do that?
AI Policy & Regulation value: human_autonomy for: humanity skeptical fear → raw LLM
Insightful shift in perspective. It’s vital to prioritize ethical frameworks in AI development.
AI Policy & Regulation value: beneficence for: society demanding approval → raw LLM
← Prev 1 2 3 12 13 14 15 16 29 30 31 Next →