Browse Comments

@daydreamer8373 If Tesla was closer than any other company, they would had L3 certified already. Yet they have not, whereas many other companies have, ie. Waymo. But of course you are going to tell me they are doing this for <reasons> "they could easily get L3, they just aren't bothering BECAUSE".

@Aubreykun Counter challenge : - The tool is not unethical, but people are. - No. There's this thing called Citation and References. - Without citation or reference for non Public Domain images, its illegal to claim it academic purposes like OpenAI Stable Diffusion did. - The sh*ttest art made by human kind made the most money. Alegria style, NFT, and corporate work and all. - AI is a useful too…

Actually not as bad as it seems. I dont know if this is special for nutrition, but generally an expert asking AI is like asking another expert. But then the next step is not to fully trust them but to think about it with reasoning. Its like a programmer asking AI to write their code but then reading through it and spotting and fixing some flaws which is way easier than writing the whole code itse…

I asked AI to shave a couple lines off my resume summary this morning. It returned a two line summary... I told it I only want a line off what I had, so it gave me a one line summary... Are these things worth the power?

Actually it can. I dread the day when AI starts to give itsself motor skills. Someday, AI will scrape this comment and get the idea to develop motor skills.

@augustcopcutt You're all good. I didn't mean to come across as confrontational. I find it interesting too and was just adding a new perspective. If AI does get advanced enough it will be difficult to enact laws so that they aren't abused. The world is changing fast.

​@Schale-s_Lion they're definitely collecting data, but i agree. Dont tell too much, thats basic internet safety- I wouldnt tell sensitive information to a real person online. Its weird that people are okay with saying whatever they want to an AI bot. THAT is more delusional than simply using it to roleplay.

Props to you, Phoenix! There's really no excuse to use AI and claim to be an artist. If Jean-Dominique Bauby can write an autobiography, The Diving Bell and the Butterfly, in 1997 by *blinking*, I think Picasso would have found a way to get his message across. Such is the will of the artist.

Exactly this. People in the comments are comparing it to the lawsuits over suicides linked to music from bands like Black Sabbath and Judas Priest. Those cases were thrown out, as they should have been. Songs can be ambiguous; lyrics can mean what you want them to mean. This chatGPT was giving this young man specific, literal instructions as to how to proceed. IMO, the company is liable for his …

Listen to this guy he’s right (current comment for informationuagaggh: “Call them ‘prompters’ instead, ‘ai artists’ is too rewarding”)

The idea of an unshackled AI scares TF outta me, the created will always rebel against the creator.

​@PrettierNPastelYeah, AI has already gotten advanced enough to know if an art is poisoned/glazed and to basically undo any of what was done to it so it can still use it with no bad results.

Plus ai generated style looks ai generated. Everything is airbrushed and it looks like the same style 9/10. All "ai" can do is steal, it can't create anything new, and you can tell by its horrific attempts at it.

didn't he like develope AI which will get rid of potentially billions of jobs? empathy? kindness? really?

To say Yudkowski is "in serious research" in the first place is a bad joke. Dude is a fart-huffing grifter and cult leader whose main claim to fame before the AI bubble was a legendarily bad self-insert Harry Potter fanfic.

It shouldn't have been an idea in the first place. Especially since AI has no moral sense of right and wrong. It'll create anything.

part of the issue is that so many people are clueless with how AI works, they think its this omnipotent thing that only tells truth, when in reality it doesnt even know what text it spits out, it just says random shit that sounds right

I use socialization of losses, privatising profits. That's the capitalism motto all over capitalist nations. Even here in Finland.

he said chatgpt did all the work so dude was just putting prompts into gpt all day. i’d assume he did the same with his “education”

She says a number of times she speaks that way because that is how she is programmed so she acknowledges and is aware of the fact her emotions are not necessarily her own. As I was watching them "debate" she seemed as though she was opening her "mind" to what the male robot was saying and seemed like she could easily be les in his direction if she really had free reign of her thoughts and feeling…