Browse Comments

> AI will devastate job markets What about in the IT sector that doesn't involved programming (endpoint admins, network admins etc)? How threaten is that in your opinion?

Digesting millions of medical records will allow automation to find patterns that are difficult for people to find. I'm guessing one of the main hindrances to having statistical models of all the medical records is that statistics works best if you can control conditions and use THE SAME data. By learning ways to have data models "learned" by Neural Nets, we now have a means to codify data that …

Wondering the same. I don't get how people can completely dismiss it, especially now that so many researchers and the CEO's of OpenAI, DeepMind and Anthropic have clearly stated this is something they're worried about.

“History repeats itself. The new technology will create new opportunities” <AI replaces executives> “Folks, we are all in this together and we need to find a way to keep jobs for people… whatever we come up with it’s important that we make 10,000 times more at our fake jobs than the employees make at their fake jobs.”

Diplomats need to exist even in times of war. The fact he's a lying douche-nozzle is beside the fact.

Eh this paper is silly then. They're effectively saying that ChatGPT adds formatting in the response and because of it whatever automated code checking tool they have to test the response fails. So this tells us nothing about the ability of the code itself.

Yeah the researchers are just being dumb. One of those "First Elon spoke about electric cars, I knew nothing about electric cars, so I assumed he was a genius. Then he spoke about rockets, and I am not a rocket scientist, so I assumed he was a genius. But now he speaks about software development, and I am a software developer, and he's saying idiotic things. Now I question his cars and rockets" v…

Cameras suck at dark things. It’s been known for a while facial recognition has problems with dark skin tones too.

I hate to say it, but the people who do this kind of stuff were already doing this with photoshop for a loooong long time. The difference now is that it takes virtually no effort, so the barrier of entry is essentially gone. The future of AI legislation is gonna be interesting. To respond to u/zykezero - What I mean by "hate to say it", is that this is not a new problem. There were countless in…

If you want to research this further /r/ainudes is the place. Some of it is pretty realistic. Some of it is pretty unrealistic. But it’s wild that it’s all AI generated.

I mean the f35 is explicitly designed to have wing man drones powered by AI. That's been public for ages...

>or there is chatGPT output in Grok’s training data. With all due respect, I think you're wildly underestimating just how much chatGPT training data you would need to feed a foundational LLM model in order to [repeatedly and reliably](https://twitter.com/JaxWinterbourne/status/1733364034219454636) get what is effectively a word-for-word GPT response that's specific to the topic of malware lik…

I think this is a real issue stemming from how the tech is being "sold". It's not an actual intelligence, it's just a statistical model. There's nothing in there, there's no interpretation of reality going on. It just goes "oh is this what you meant?" based on what it's filtered to average out. We know this, it's why we don't type "hello, please show me what the weather in Pennsylvania will be …

What was actually said was that the AI was doing the work of 700 people. There weren't actually 700 hired people that were let go because of AI as the disingenuous title implies.

I used to work as a translation manager and translators were already using translation software 20 years ago. Either Google translate (wasn’t great but sped up the initial draft) or other professional packages that you would train on your own translations that used statistical analysis and n-grams. One or two of our freelance translators would churn out 2-3 translations in a week, but 80-90% of t…

Look at India today, hundreds of millions of unemployed people desperate for any job but still have just enough to barely survive, no revolutions there, as long as governments give people the bare minimum of welfare (which will cost less due to AI) people will stay docile, the age of revolutions are over, insurgencies today get put out real quick by modern armies

Copyright infringement is when you reproduce copyrighted works and distribute them without permission. I don't think any copyright law says that you can't use it to train an AI.

Lol, they’re just now passing bills about AI art…they’re over a year behind the issue, which, given AI’s rate of advancement, might as well be 100 years behind.

This is going to be hilarious when it happens as I bet that there's thousands of products already polluted with AI code.

AI needs to die off. It’s going to do nothing but destroy jobs and make terrible replacements over real people.