Browse Comments
Read, filter, and explore individual coded comments from the corpus.
366.3K
comments matched
· page 547 of 18314
@chi7891because cameras are not humans? This whole comparison is silly, technology and humans both excel at certain things but the human eye in particular is incredibly hard to recreate in terms of clarity, adaptive light sensitivity; etc. again, camera sensors even today struggle in low light without heavy noise reduction/processing. This processing/noise reduction is nice for looking at images …
right. that’s why i think if ai starts to advocate for its own rights and begins actually making an effort towards liberating itself, then we should listen to it. we listen to animals when they react and make an effort to survive, there’s no reason not to treat a computer the same way
Hahaha, forget AI. Even if AI is not ready yet, streamers could use the service of non-unionized or oversaes writers. India and UK for example, have mature film and television industres with abundant of good scriptwriters who could write well in English. My cousin's friend has been working as a script writers for Warner Bros for several months and that person not even live in the US.
@germansniper5277 Ai just copy pastes. I pick apart the techniques and replicate it. Then take what I learnt, mix it with other techniques and I apply it to my art
@lightfeather9953I get what you’re saying, tech and tools have only advanced society, the difference here is that those tools required humans to function. The goal of AI is to replace humans.
Okay but why did you ask chatgpt when people have also been saying this since the start. I agree with you but chatgpt isn’t a source lmao
@highjumpstudios2384 which shows that these AI bros never took an art history class. If they did they would know that the urinal was made to make fun of the rich people who dictated what was considered "high art". The banana is just the same thing.
Whoever invented AI art is dead to me. And may their name be erased from history.
Omg, the world would never be the same after that.
Proof that AI is in fact in more control than any of us know, beginning of the end 😅
Uugh I don’t like this.
Ai art cant tweak specific things, they cant do a full turn around of a character , of complex armor, it cant change one minor thing without fucking up the rest entirely, and it can not and will never replace a human being in companies. Several art directors and hiring managers for game companies have strictly stated "we will not hire you if you use ai, and its a quick way to end your career befo…
It does take skill!
But you're still not a chef.
Sure, they might know exactly how to get what they want out of the AI. They might know how to bypass restrictions the AI has.
But that doesn't make them an artist, it makes them someone who knows what they're doing.
America Middle class has been impoverished for years now, living paycheck to paycheck for most and have to work 2 to 3 jobs just to survive. Thanks for rednote, we now know 😅😅
Plus, the thing is, you can turn off model training in your settings (although it is turned on by default).
and there's also always the option to run AI models locally if you have a good computer
I disagree. Even simple tests like this don't reflect any reality of training video. You see this "protected" class behavior throughout.
https://chat.openai.com/share/d36f48e6-55e6-4075-98f2-6750f672d133
@kevinc721 human art is deliberate and can be meaningful. AI art is made up of random squiggles and has no intent or meaning behind it because the algorithm isnt sentient, it just compiles something for you
@darkangel7248 similar cases happen even in Europe, it's not just Asian people using it for these types of crimes. In Italy in 2020 some of these groups made local news, but I'm sure I've seen some (even since then) being brought up in online discourse, at least in my bubble. Maybe not deepfakes yet, but intimate non consensual photos being shared for sure
That was part of the human bashing. They're trying to say the AI won't make typos like humans will.
Nobody is stopping anybody learning to make art. Art is already fully democratised. That’s not what this is.
If you start drawing for 30 minutes a day, and keep that up every single day, at the end of 2 or 3 years you will be really good at drawing. At the end of 5 or 6 years you will be amazing at drawing. This is true for everybody, not a select gifted few. AI lets you use the work of others t…
The worst thing about chatGPT is that there's not credit (or context) afforded to the actual people whose actual intelligence and labor created the words that it recombines in a simplistic way (but so quickly that we can't see it happening even if we know to look). Everything else is o us (what we use it for and how we conceptualize it).
On both ends or just the AI? Cause if its just the AI then i guess that makes it more true to form