Browse Comments

The thing about the “classism” argument not having people to look over work is that… they did! On the Nano forums! But when the grooming allegations happened, they shut down the forums completely IN THE MIDDLE OF NOVEMBER. So they took that resource away from writers… only to push their AI “beta reader” and call them classist and ableist for disagreeing. Absolutely wild. Edit: I wrote this befor…

AI is useful to help write code when you know and understand exactly what that code needs to do. The trouble is, writing the code isn't where the real skill lies. The real skill is all about figuring out not just what the requirement is but also whether the requirement makes sense in the first place. The mistake is to confuse an ability to generate syntactically correct code with the ability to …

Companies: no one want to work, we are so understaffed Also companies: use those ai stuff

Regulation requiring a blatantly identifiable watermark on AI generated content, an adequately funded department to watchdog and enforce the regulation, and adequately punitive consequences for circumventing the regulation would solve the problem. But oh, wait, that would require functioning GOVERNMENT.

Robot: walks out of the truck Robot: im alive Robot with hat: fires at the robot that walked out of the truck

They actually use "I asked the robot if it was lying to me, and it said it wasn't!" as a defense.

There HAS to be regulations to AI art to protect jobs in gaming industry, movies, commissions, and websites. Sites like Twitter, Art Station, Deviantart should be SUED for forcing all accounts to opt-in automatically to train their AI which is INSANE. Permissions and lack of respect for artists is why I hate companies pushing for Gen-AI in art/voices so much!

The Men of Culture have been banned from this exhibit for repeatedly trying to see what this robot does with a cucumber.

I really despise the term "ai agents". One, it's not AI. But second, it implies agency, which they simply do not have.

C. not even humans can read human emotions. GPT-3 can already 'simulate' emotion to an extent but it can't infer emotion from text if someone is being dishonest.

a lot of common folk dont really like interacting with robots though, I dont mind automated processes...unless they suck, which a lot of them still do.

Talk about how AI be lying and conforming to false narratives…this is why people need to know Jesus and be led by Holy Spirit. Jesus is The Truth!

So you developed Ai, made millions selling your developments to Google, and NOW you’re against it? Thanks man.

Or… you could actually write the essay which in turn makes writing easier for you going forward, so once AI detectors get better you actually know how to do an essay yourself

I'm just an amateur artist, but in my opinion these kinds of protests are counterproductive. I think redrawing the ai generated image (i refuse to call those art) legitimises ai as a tool in the process for artists. Secondly, it makes the ai bros feel like they are contributing to artists' inspiration. Thirdly, they can scrape all these drawings and feed them into their ai to train it even better…

Implying that creativity is easy just because AI is good at it misunderstands the role of training data. There’s a massive amount of creative content online—because that’s what gets shared, consumed, and posted. In contrast, there’s far less publicly available data on how CEOs think or operate. More output means faster training and better AI performance. It has little to do with how complex the …

As long as AI relies on classical computing it'll never truly get wild like being ACTUALLY creative, or coming up with random ideas on the spot lol

My mentor who's in private practice was literally begging for an A.I. to come and help him with the insane workload. Realistically, though, radiologists are working like dogs because there are so many images to read. Trend is that radiologists become efficient, and docs in other fields become happy and send in even more images. They NEED A.I. to survive right now lol. Everyone who say rads can be…

I'm not scared. In my opinion as long as not everything is automated programmers will still exist. And if everything is automated then you as a programmer can sit back and enjoy. Win win

Le monde n'est pas prêt, ni socialement, ni economiquement, ni moralement à l'arrivé de l'IA dans le monde du travail. Oui cela va supprimer des emplois, des carrière et des entreprise, mais ces gens là, on va en faire quoi ? Il y aura une grande partie de la population qui se retrouvera sans emploi dans les prochaines années (10, 20 ans ), et on va tous les renvoyer se former dans autre chose ? …