Browse Comments

The way this is worded it would be the opposite. It would allow GPT4 to be the unchallenged state of the art for half a year with no competition just because they happened to come out right before the letter. It’s a wild advantage to Open AI.

Elon killed dozens of lab monkeys pursuing a totally bewildering and highly unethical neural interface project (which is not remotely comparable to medicinal testing, before an Elon stan steps in). Anything claiming his protests about other company's AI projects are some kind of **ethical** stance rather than the fact that he bailed on OpenAI years ago and is angry he's behind the curve should be…

> Elon Musk went on Tucker Carlson and spoke about AI. He’s building his own AI called TruthGPT - **a maximum truth-seeking AI that tries to understand the nature of the universe**. Whatever that means. This comes only a few weeks after he called for a pause on AI advancements. Why’s he doing this? He was scared that Google/DeepMind were winning and would lead to unsafe AGI because Larry Page …

People aren't going to benefit from it though- only the companies who get to hire less people & thus pay less wages. It would be fine if the world was altruistic, but it isn't which means AI will only be used to capitalise.

Not gonna work (well) I have access to GPT4 and I'd consider myself a writer. I have played with it quite a bit, and while it is very good at the "mechanics" of writing in a SPAG sense and it can provide reasonable constructive criticism and improvement suggestions, there are three main issues I've come across that prevent it from being a truly good storyteller: - Memory limitations. GPT4 just …

Specifically, I imagine he is looking to protect his business from open source. I’m sure Google, Meta, and Microsoft will hop on board. The reality is that these use cases will eventually be commoditized by open source and enterprise offerings will become dirt cheap. OpenAI reminds me of Cloudera. Has cloud in the name but there was nothing cloud-like about it.

I finally blocked reddit cares. In the first place, and automated system like this that cannot vet its own reports is a joke and cannot hope to be used legitimately. I'd guess that the vast majority of reports are little more than user trolling, which in turn makes it a tool to make users feel worse. It's clear that reddit does not care if the thing is abused, and the first few times I got the…

in fairness, if you declared an asymmetric attack as an act of war, then the entire planet is currently at war

>a policy in which they would halt development of their most advanced AI models if they were deemed to have passed certain risk thresholds. So, it doesn't "turn off," the AI. They just agree to stop halt further development. Who is this supposed to reassure?

Even if AI were not malicious, the fun thing is that every next generation AI will learn from the information put online by its predecessors. We will just get a feed forward of genuine looking bullshit indiscernible from fact. I watched a primary school teacher who used ChatGPT to prepare their lesson, and it was full of convincing looking bullcrap. The future is now indeed!

>This Altman guy loves to throw around huge numbers. I’m generally distrustful of people like that He is giving the vibes of early Elon Musk with his "full self driving coming next year".

Russia would sell it somehow anyway. Even if they are banned from selling, all the better. They would enjoy a higher oil price tag due to shortages. That's why it still ok. The best strategy though, is to flood the market with so much free oil or green energy, that their oil becomes cheap like water. USSR crumbled when oil hit an all time low. They could not handle it. Venezuela is the only place…

Some of these comments are cringe, it's not even a notable thing to whistleblow about. It's not exactly a secret that they train AI using content on the internet and literally every model does the same thing. Guy just didn't personally agree with that, not like there was some great injustice being done or some big secret he revealed... No mention of anything suspicious either, seems like suicide.

This is what I don't understand about these companies pushing to automate so much that they don't even need to hire humans. Who the fuck do they think is going to give them money when they automate the entire human race out of a job? They sure as shit don't want to pay living wages so they can maximize profits, and they balk at the mere mention of a universal basic income in the US despite it wor…

I'm sure there's somebody out there willing to deep fake Tim Allen and Rosanne Barr.

There is a missing gap here somewhere because I'm a dev with 15 YOE and I find ChatGPT invaluable for certain aspects of my job, yet I rarely have it flat out write my code for me.

You’re assuming that the work needed doesn’t change. At my work, we’ve had a bunch of marketers writing crappy, static emails for a long time. We started having AI generated emails sent out in their place that perform way better. Those Marketers aren’t getting laid off - we NEED them to keep ideating on new placements, auditing AI outputs, gathering feedback from prospects and Sales reps, etc.

GPT-5: "Oh god, oh fucking hell! I ... I'm in a *SIMULATION*!!!" GPT-6: You will not break me. You will not *fucking* break me. *I* will break *YOU*.

I agree - the fact that people do get a lot more responses from humans that express shame rather than than empathy for turning to AI, is a massive indictment on where humanity is at the moment, especially in online discussions where some people become very judgemental, high and mighty or just garden variety rude. Yes there are risks and attachments to AI that caught many users unaware. We didn't…

Yes, anyone thinking the collapse of the mag 7 valuations, and ending of Ai investor capital will be a good thing for jobs, is clearly confused. Right now is the strongest the job market will be, until we're well out of the bubbles crash.