Browse Comments

I own and operate a construction company. I have a few hundred employees. I don’t care that that academic guy says, AI is absolutely going to cut my staff in half at least before I retire. Simple example. Hanger layout, locating the hangers that get placed overhead to carry the pipe we install. That all used to be done by pipefitters. Now it’s a robot that literally drives itself around a…

Ah lovely, AI for grading, Ai for correcting, Ai for finding cheaters, ai for everything but the things ai should be used for, like finding the answers to things more conviently c:

One thing to remember, the people on the side of AI art/ AI will replace artists genuinely hope they are wrong because it’s definitely not to their benefit if they’re right.

That is not "jailbroken ai"... That is a clever language model that is responding based on a logical linear framework... It is not lying or sentient.

Honestly doesn't matter to me if they gain sentience or not in my lifetime, I'm still going to be nice to the chatbots

I think it's... tricky. To say "it's far away from now" does not bode well because technology's development is moving exponentially so what isn't possible today could be very possible in 20, 10, 5, or next year. You can't control that, and once you've opened that pandora's box, there's no going back. I'm a millenial and I have still met classical graphic designers who were trained on drawing all …

The real safety issue isn’t just compute or policy — it’s training. We trained AI on our language, which means thousands of years of history, media, and culture turned into statistical patterns. The deepest layer of human language (and that includes all languages) is what we all know as The Game—the strategic, unconscious moves embedded in nearly all discourse. That is now embedded in AI too. And…

So far, we can't even make a car that reliably drives itself, but I'm sure that will change, if not soon, then eventually. But it's not really AI that concerns me most, it's the humans that could control it.

The issue with LLM's at the moment is it can not tell the difference between the answer a user wants and the answer a user expects. We want our AI's to be friendly and helpful, but we also expect them to be dangerous and manipulative. Desire and expectation looks the same to a thing that lacks a moral compass.

Anyone who trusts the government is stupid. Of couse they are going to use AI to spy on us and our enemies.

It first happened after they talked about AI development needing to take a pause and thought it was a lame joke. Then it kept happening.

​@futurestorytellerexcept AI doesn't create anything, it literally steals references made by thousands of other artists and composites them together, it can't create something out of nothing, it can only create something that's like something else it's already seen. It just steals from real artists.

Thanks for the info bro. This guy really made the video so over exaggerated with fake claims I was wondering when did AI learnt all this stuff

We are automating human effort and creativity (Arts) like it's some kind of meaningless job, what's the point of living in a world like this?

⁠@Mintzoidyeah art isn’t supposed to be about the highest quality and most marketable only succeeding… if you are not drawn to the human experience of style or expression you simply aren’t a creative and that’s okay. But to put people’s self expression of personality into the meat grinder of productivity is crazy. Shouldn’t even sing or write a song if it’s not a fully developed orchestral? At th…

You are right. And we all do it. See, I didn't invent these words that I'm typing. I'm not even the first to put them in this order. But I'm influenced by those around me and various media to use these words in this order to express this thought. The exact same formula is what a painter does. Ditto for all artists. And it is ridiculously similar to what the AI does.

Imagine travelling the world to take pictures of it, just to find out that you can do a Google image search and have an endless supply. Really, if that's your argument then every kind of automation and innovation should be seen as bad. It is great that aspects of life become easier, not harder!

@honeybun3862 its not abt being "objectively shit" ur just clearly not a fan of it? Like u cant really give a good answer if your bias already against whatever is done with it yk, and AI will keep growing too so. Also the people who use the generators are not at major fault, its the developers.

Even with all the guardrails in the world, trillions of dollars of research, the protections only need to fail once. If you somehow believe we'll get it perfect the first time, I'm sorry but you don't understand humans well enough. It is so easy for these systems to self-propagate that even the tiniest lapse could be exploited, and all of a sudden we have countless untrustworthy models on system…

Pictures can be art. But art doesn't mean pictures. AI is not pictures, it's barely an imitation.