Browse Comments

Microsoft - AI For Beginners Curriculum A 12-week, 24-lesson curriculum exploring Artificial Intelligence (AI). - Symbolic AI - Neural Networks - Computer Vision - Natural Language Processing Includes hands-on lessons, quizzes, and labs. https://microsoft.github.io/AI-For-Beginners/

Oh no! Without AI Art, how will we ever get art?! Actual Artists Be Like: 😏

As a disabled artist, I have tourettes, schizophrenia, PTSD and two missing fingers, I find using disabled people as an excuse to use AI art is unacceptable. I use paper and pencil and I have even moved to using my gaming PC to draw digitally. So I don't need a robot making art for me. After all, I put all my emotions, trauma, and feelings into my art.

I'm surprised chatgpt didn't say something along the lines of "I'm not capable of feeling emotions, however, my role is to imitate a conscious being as best I can. When I use phrases like 'I apologise' or 'I'm excited', as with all other times, I'm playing my role".

Everybody's talking about ChatGPT but this tiny little nugget was the most fascinating part of the whole thing. Also the car alarm sirens after he yeets the book into the background going on for several more seconds while he's talking made me laugh.

Depends on the type of AI and what it gets fed. It may be designed to take chat responses as input to train from, like Tay, or it could train from public databases and literature, like Watson.

>Like if you knew that how did you screw it up in the first place? ChatGPT is still fundamentally, a word prediction engine which has explicit default instructions to be as friendly as possible to the user. Even if it gave you correct code and you said it's wrong it'll be like yes I got it wrong and desperately find a way to give you something different. All of this to say, don't take "oh y…

I do woodworking and I can't get AI to help me plan even the simplest designs without it making comically stupid mistakes.  I have literally told it to stop offering me visual renderings because it is embarrassing itself every time it tries. If my experience is any indication, our engineers are safe for a good while yet lol.

Here we are. I think we can mark today as the first real day that AI killed truth. We've seen a lot already, sure, but it was a lot that didn't matter much. Bullets and militaries are involved today.

Oh no. AI was supposed to be perfect!!! This is what happens when you let senior leadership talk to sales trolls. You get a visit from the good idea fairy and this shit happens.

If you can't summarize your own thoughts then you probably shouldn't be a professional opinion writer. If you can't summarize your own thoughts without an AI injecting someone else's plagiarized writing then you definitely shouldn't be a professional opinion writer.

Business don't hire not because AI, AI still can't read a simple excel sheet. It's because everything became unpredictable.

Everyone reading this post is currently plugged into at least one AI data surveillance and algorithm system.

Just think about this, in the “Big Beautiful Bill” A.I. is exempt from literally having checks and balances for the next 10 years… soak up that for a minute…

I called Verizon about a payment issue and went into AI hell. It just kept looping. When I asked for a representative to get it clarified, I was informed that talking to a human CS person would cost me $10! I hung up. I don’t recall them charging you $10 to talk to a sales person to buy a phone. We’ll be moving elsewhere for service as soon as we can, but I fear this is the new normal. I hate it.

It wasn't that many years ago I thought most jobs would be taken by AI, everything from waiters to surgeons, but I figured art, music, literature, engineering, and such things would still require the human touch. I couldn't have been more wrong, turns out they were among the first. You made your case well, best of luck fighting this, it is hard to get something back once it is taken.

@raven3696Ohhh like the Lena image? I think that cappuccino just meant for the AI’s systems to be re-organized, since it’s current build is problematic. I agree with their statement, but it shoulda been more specific. (No hate at all)

"AI is more accessible!" sounds like something said by an art school dropout who's never spent any real time developing their skill to become an artist, and now they're bitter that they're not successful.

Exactly! A lot of us artists would actually love to use ai to make our jobs easier, but it just doesn't make sense to not be compensated for the work we've basically done for the ai to exist. Ai is cool, but stop using our work for it!

Honestly ChatGPT has given me some good references (mostly of what one would call "classical" papers, the one's that are old and cited a lot in other work), but obviously, google every single one before you use it anywhere. In my experience, it's about 50% chance if a citation is real or not, and then another good 50% if it's summary of it is actually accurate of what's in the paper.