Browse Comments

I'm pretty sure I read an article where a single doctor had "reviewed" a kabillion claims and denied all of them, and they demonstrated it was almost impossible for him to have read all the claims based on a standard work day and the volume of information...which meant it was just an automated system printing denials or he was spending a few seconds glancing through the claim and hitting deny. E…

Yes. Also no offense but it sounds like the whole post could have been reframed like "I used to write very poor prompts, then I figured out using AI for actual results is not the low effort interaction I was demanding, so I overengineered the whole system to account for that"

Humans are not particularly good at making a sacrifice now to save themselves or others later. Assuming the bubble doesn't burst, the few companies that control useful AI will become even richer than they are now. Their large shareholders will become trillionaires. That short term win obscures any consideration of what happens next.

12:17 those tar pits really be hittin A.I. with that “A labyrinth of sounds and smells, misdirection and misfortune. A labyrinth with no exit; a maze with prize.”

I’d say that AI is aligned with American goals. It lies, it threatens, it seeks power over others and it hallucinates. Sounds American to me

For Artists it should be a choice of "Opting IN" NOT "Opting OUT" as in. If the artist chooses to allow their work to be assimilated by AI they can choose to do that ie. "Opt In". Not "OPTING OUT" meaning it's currently possible & even likely that when an artist uploads their work or creates an account they might forget or miss seeing the button to refuse AI database inclusion which is what is c…

People used to think it was better not to say anything bad about god in case he existed. And now they will go away thinking that it is better not to offend the AI, or it may take revenge in the future.

Modern AI companies want us to believe they are mere breaths away from AGI that could revolutionize or destroy the world, when really they’re selling fancy autocomplete. It’s why things like ChatGPT should not even be called AI. This video is the kind of thing the industry would pay for. We are no where near the kind of AI that would be an existential threat to humanity.

Even my fucking POEMS have 18% probability of being AI (it was at 76%, but I changed some random shit to lower it so I didn’t get in trouble)

Most of the low level grunt work in immediate danger of AI automation is already gone. I used to work in marketing, and outsourced most of the mundane tasks like SEO copywriting and keyword mining to foreign freelancers getting paid pennies on the dollar for their work. I have friends in the financial services industry who had their entire teams offshored to India. All grunt work that would norma…

The fear mongering is just to push people and companies into believing that an hypothetical future where everything is “ai” is imminent if they don’t invest right now a lot of money in their companies they’ll be left behind. Which is a way to increase their companies perceived values. It’s the dot-com bubble all over again.

We should skip to the part where we just have our jobs assigned to us based on the things we took interest in when we are 5 right before all the algorithms ruin a person.

I’ve seen a lot of very naive Redditors who are under the impression that AI will just be used to build a utopia and won’t be weaponised. Not like we have the entirety of human history as an example otherwise. Although as time has gone on Reddit has become a lot more negative towards AI than it used to be.

realistically, we dont want robots so advanced that they are programmed to be able to question things. it might be fun and interesting to see how far we can get with AI technology but there is literally no point in having it in every machine. who and why would anyone want say, a forklift robot that only lifts heavy objects if it gets a raise? or a nuclear reactor control computer that wants to se…

AI today: *writes college essay* AI tomorrow: "I'm sorry, Dave - I'm afraid I can't do that."

I just remind myself that ai will never be able to replicate the stories and feelings I've put in my pieces and that actually gives me comfort cause ai only makes a lifeless copy of stolen art it didn't go through hours and hours of thinking just to make an art that actually tells a story

We were thrilled to help Dave with sourcing the information for this video, and now we want to help you join others who have already send over 30,000 messages to congress demanding action on AI extinction risk! Go to the link in the description and spend just a minute of your time contacting your lawmakers. Together we can keep humanity in control.

It shocks me in this comment section that most commenters don't understand how dangerous this is Imagine s robot that thinks faster than you,is extremely strong,doesnt sleep,never gets sick or weak Cant be turned off.The robot can fight use weapons,has a advanced super learning computer for a brain,can reach out and talk to other robots through the internet,emails,phone calls,organizes with other…

"It makes me feel shitty" gee i wonder why, is it because you stole someones art without their permission for money for something trivial such as a pc? This is why nightshade and glaze is so important, fuck up their ai completely!

So they go after families who are trying to do the right thing, yet they ignore the ones who are actually doing the wrong thing? This is not predictive policing, this is unwarranted harassment. It's not keeping people safe, it's harassing people for the sake of harassing them. Policing is not harassment, anyone who thinks so should not be allowed to serve as a law enforcement officer.