Browse Comments

People saying that AI already got good, but they forget that an image might have 100s of components. So with a 99% success rate, there will always be something wrong that any artist will spot.

Unless mr. A.i. can magiclly make greed disapear, i dont see how it'll lead us into a brigher future.

I believe we should all collectively accept AI as the tool it is and use it for what it should be intended to. Calculating taxes and the other boring stuff no one wants to do

The only way to improve AI is to make it does these tasks, find out what doesn't work right, and reprogram it. That's why we use AI for these things. Clearly it's not been perfected yet

I'm so sorry to break that to you but since this ai is based on text to video, it could even replicate 2D animations if someone type it

Only spell trouble for Men? What about Women? And vice versa Perfect AI girlfriend or boyfriend sounds unhealthy and problematic.

I can also confirm that chatGPT is 100% woke feminist. It told me that men getting used and abused by women in relationships is a part of relationships now being more "equitable", and that we men should just accept it.

Their brains rewrite history, and they literally believe their own version of it. It's automatic. Their version of history justifies their actions and they see you as the reason for the collapse of the relationship, or at best, they think to themselves that you two were just "incompatible", instead of how they themselves caused most of the problems.

Personally, AI is already taking over my job, literally whilst I work. As a full-stack developer, I'm writing code, whilst an AI helps to fill in code that would only take me a few more seconds to write. Ultimately in the future, AI will continue to extrapolate, making it more than capable of solving larger problems.

Legit, sane questions you are asking to the future. Every analysis is like a prism that should be looked at every angle. Bad ones, but also good ones... So I'd like to invoke a very important detail : AI, robots, and more generally automation is the expertise of producing faster, cheaper, bigger. But producers can't sustain without consumers, and consuming needs resources (aka money). Which is …

When Google came, students googled the answers for their essays. When you could download essays, students downloaded and copied essays. When you can use AI to write essays, students use AI to write essays. If students can take short cuts, they will. You have to teach the students how to study, before they study. Teach them the benefits of knowing things, before teaching them to know things. Les…

We were so preoccupied with the thought “if we could”, that we never stopped to think “if we should”.

Absolute bonkers, this development is pretty scary, I consider 80% of humans on the net to be gullible enough to fall prey to all kinds of future AI shenanigans. Edit:6 Months later December 2025, I have to admit I was way off, in the last year things have accelerated big time and I can't tell the difference often between real and artificial myself anymore.

Shouldn't this extend to the "supply chain" rule for boycotting? Boycott Nvidia, Microsoft, and all of the other beasts profiting from OpenAI's existence?

As of last month, all of the minor accidents were the fault of human drivers and none were reported to be due to the [Google car.](http://www.theverge.com/2015/5/11/8586661/google-self-driving-car-11-accidents-not-at-fault) With all of the texting, fatigued, distracted, and stupid drivers, self driving cars might be the biggest advance in car safety since the seatbelt.

But no one thinks about the obvious next problem. Who is going to purchase that value, or pay the taxes that keep government running if AI takes all the high paying white collar jobs. It’s gonna get fucked out there. No one is talking about why the hell so many billionaires have moved out to islands and are preparing for end of the world stuff.

Soon there's going to be subreddits dedicated to fucking up AI learning models people will figure out exactly how the model scrapes the site for information, then will fill the AI with the most garbage ass garbage content the world has ever seen people will log into reddit just to visit those subs and post things in the comments like "A tree can talk, not by definition - but by using it's mou…

All that money, 500 billions that gonna end in CEO and Executives bags not actually those 500 billions being useful to improve AI.

RIP to the young dude. As for the parents suing, if it wasn’t ChatGPT, it could just as easily have been Google searches, TV news reports, or even books from the library showing how others had taken their lives. At some point, parents need to take responsibility for noticing when their child is struggling, rather than immediately looking for someone else to blame.

A few years ago: "In the future, AI will do the tasks that need labour so that people can spend more time being creative!!" Actual AI: