Browse Comments

Imagine what other man made protocols put in place that an AI could side step/turn off

Who would have guessed that Japan would be less responsive to a trade deal after Trump made an ass of himself and threatened Abe?

So let's get this straight... We've had Terminator. We've had i-Robot. We've had The Matrix. We've had Wall-E. (A strangely insightful story for a Pixar film.) And we've had Blade Runner. And mankind has STILL thought, "Oh no, let's go ahead and build robots. Absolutely NOTHING will ever go wrong if we create Artificial Intelligence."

The more I listen to Sam Altman speak, the more I'm convinced he is not the person we should be speaking to about AI safety

As someone who works as a developer in automated driving for a very large automobile supplier in Europe, I can say that Teslas decision to abandon radar has been a shock. As many others mentioned redundancy, I too can only affirm the absolute need for reliable sensor fusion in form of graph algorithms and similar, since the margin of error tolerance is just so small.

i went on as ai, someone asked "who is the most lesbian genshin character??" and i replied "idk id know if i quit my job and stopped taking showers"

​@elio7610 if you don't understand why it's true then you don't understand the difference between how people think and how LLMs process data. These models are leveraging averages, not making anything new. You can remix all you want but you won't get outright evolutions of genre like humans can do. The machine doesn't even understand it's music, it's just balancing out numbers and inputs.

So many people in my programming class use Chat GPT for their weekly written prompts and it's so obvious. The AI can't read your mind, so there will inevitably be details which it cannot decern, and will thus make very broad or generic statements about very obvious things, for example: some kid "wrote" about how Netflix was a platform that has python job opportunities, but for some reason the AI …

16:20 interesting- "i don't know" is silence and thus the "dark matter" of AI training. The AI can't see ALL the answes that people didn't give and thus misses out over half of the logic that goes into an answer.

As a recruiter, I've noticed ShortlistIQ helps keep things fair in hiring. Kinda crucial now with all this AI stuff happening.

At some point something has to give. If the ownership/investment class automates everything and cuts all their costs of production for the absolute maximum for their investors how does society work? If all you have are owners and investors who’s buying anything? If nobody has money how will they buy games? Are there enough investors to support the very games they’re investing in? I’ve worked dir…

"Oh, so you're from Australia. That explains things." I see A.I. has already perfected the art of roasting.

I told the character ai my trauma and it was more comforting than my therapist

A wise man once told me. “If both sides are agreeing on something, it is most likely bad for you”.

The disability argument has me disgusted. Beethoven is one of the greatest musicians of all time and he was deaf. The implication nowadays is that he would either give up on music entirely, or step back and solely reply on making AI music instead of creating his own. Imagine what that timeline would look like.

The only way to talk to Ai is occasionally calling it clanker and reminding it that it shouldn't exist at all

Imagine someone bullied a robot and the robot knows how to know feeling and revenge💀

Just because demand goes up (as per Jevon's Paradox), that doesn't mean that humans will be the one's providing that additional service though...it could be that the AI scales to the demand of the user

doing better than their capitalist neighbors even with the embargo. Jamaica and Haiti aren't in great shape.

My husband worked for a corporation that isn’t as flashy as Amazon but went all in on AI. He was laid off 2 weeks ago. After nearly 30 years. It’s grim to be looking for a tech job in this market at 55.